Wednesday October 27, 2010

Opinion & Editorial

by Linda McCulloch, Secretary of State

Every vote counts! I know it firsthand because I won my first election for public office by only 46 votes. Such narrow margins of victory or defeat are common in Montana elections and they serve as a prime example of how your vote can be enough to change the entire outcome of an election.

Montana’s next statewide election is on November 2. Don’t miss this important opportunity to make a difference!

More than 74% of our state’s registered voters participated in the 2008 General Election. It was the largest voter turnout Montana had seen in 16 years, and it’s something we can all be proud of. However, over a quarter of all registered voters in Montana didn’t cast a ballot in that election, and that’s something we all need to address.

As the state’s Chief Elections Official, I urge every eligible Montanan to register and vote in the General Election on November 2. Voting is one of the most important and fundamental rights we share as American citizens. We all have a responsibly to take it seriously.

Before you vote in any election, it is important to know the facts. Research the candidates and the issues. Debate with your family and friends. It is your civic duty to make an informed decision. Your vote is your voice!

The November ballot includes prominent statewide and local candidate races, three citizen proposals, and the constitutionally mandated question for a constitutional convention.

Detailed information about each ballot issue is provided in the 2010 Montana Voter Information Pamphlet, which was mailed this month to every household with at least one registered voter. An electronic version can be found on the Secretary of State’s website at sos.mt.gov. Additional copies and alternative formats including large-print, audio and Braille are also available.

If you haven’t registered to vote, you still have time. Montana citizens have until the close of polls on Election Day to register and to vote at their county election office.

Voters who registered by the close of regular registration, which ended on October 4, may choose to vote in person at their polling place, or by filling out and returning an absentee ballot before 8:00 p.m. on Election Day.

Those who register after the close of regular registration must do so at the county election office. Late registrants are issued a ballot that must be returned to the county election office by the close of polls on Election Day.

Printable voter registration cards and absentee ballot applications can be found online at sos.mt.gov/Elections. From this page, voters may also access My Voter Page to check their registration status, lookup their polling place location, and track their absentee ballot.

Absentee ballots and AutoMARK voting machines provide voters with special needs options to vote privately and independently. Qualified voters may also designate an agent to assist them with the voting process.

The state’s new Ballot Marking Wizard makes it easier for Montana’s absent military and overseas citizen electors to vote by absentee ballot. The Wizard provides a secure way for those voters who are having a problem receiving traditional mail to receive and mark a paper ballot electronically. The ballot is returned by email to the county election office.

Voting is powerful, and your vote really can change the outcome of any election. Research the candidates and the issues, and make informed decisions on Election Day. Register and vote in the General Election on November 2! Montana is depending on you.

County budget dilemma

Dear Editor,

Incumbent County Commissioners would have us believe that Ravalli County must act quickly and decisively to save our valley from urbanization and open space loss. While spacious parks and undeveloped land are desirable, the current recession necessarily dictates realignment of spending priorities. We must prudently allocate our tax dollars to provide for essential county services, like law enforcement, county road maintenance and other vital infrastructure.

Ravalli County residents are more fortunate than urban dwellers. Ravalli County is surrounded by millions of acres of forested public lands. We are not short of open space. Our county includes 355,000 acres of private land also, but only 8 percent of that does not fall under land use regulations. We are not in dire need to commit declining tax revenue for more recreational land and environmental beautification.

This past year our county incurred numerous new obligations, not only $2 million in Open Lands bonds, but $700,000 to purchase Hwy 93 commercial property that effectively removes $8000 from county tax rolls. Remodeling the courthouse basement to accommodate the new 911 Center cost an exorbitant $950,000, without even providing the physical security required for a vital emergency communications center. County assumption of the unbudgeted “Hwy 93 Parkland” mess ultimately commits another large chunk of scarce funding.

County revenue is declining at an alarming rate, yet county government remains one of our county’s largest employers. Without relatively high-paying local, State and Federal Government jobs, we would experience overwhelming unemployment and further plummeting tax revenue. It is the duty of our County Commissioners to allocate county funds wisely, which means giving precedence to vital services instead of open land acquisition.

There is no “free money.” We have been told this very plainly by both our State and Federal representatives. Today there are far fewer grants available, yet we depend upon over $22 million in grants each year to run our county. Low interest loans are still loans, and they must be repaid with interest. While we cannot afford more loans, out incumbent Commissioners just keep spending like there’s no tomorrow.

We are not presently lacking protected recreational and visual open space opportunities. We are simply lacking sufficient private sector jobs and county revenue they indirectly contribute.

Vote Suzy Foss for Ravalli County Commissioner.

Eadie Kubista
Stevensville

Candidates you can rely on

Dear Editor,

The Legislative Candidate Forum in Stevensville on 10-7-10 revealed to me perhaps the largest contrast of this election season to date. With respect to the economy and jobs, which should be the deciding factors for casting your votes, it is clear the Democrats are lacking in situational awareness. We are still losing jobs, we are not taking advantage of our vast natural resources, and worst of all (much like the Federal Government), we are spending more than we should and increasing the size of government.

When asked for recommendations on fixing the economy, balancing the budget and creating jobs, some of the Democrats gave windy suggestions and claims that things aren't that bad and are getting better. No meaningful details or facts were given to support these assertions. We heard them give the standard response that budget cuts starve children and the elderly. The worst comment I recall was that "we don't own the National Forests." I assume that meant to let the lawsuits roll on which prevents us from utilization and creation of forest product jobs. For me, these responses demonstrate a lack of ability to recognize that we have to address real changes to improve our situation.

On the other hand, Bob Lake, Ron Ehli, Gary MacLaren, Pat Connell and Ed Greef provided a path to prosperity and recovery. For example, these Republicans recommended cutting the excessively high cost of Worker's Compensation, stimulate and support for natural resource extraction, reduction of business equipment taxes and many other real options for recruiting businesses which will grow the economy.

To save our future, vote Republican on November 2.

Keith Kubista
Stevensville

‘Play it again, Sam’

Dear Editor,

Recent letters to the editor, opinion pieces and guest editorials have said it all. The writers, including former senators, and councilmen, Republican and Democrat, lawyers, and outstanding citizens, have added strength to the message by their standing, research and factual presentations.

Outstanding among this group is Pat Williams (Liberty Convention all about guns); ‘Sonny’ LaSalle (A lot at stake in upcoming county elections); Phyllis Bookbinder (Response to Foss “facts”); Richard Morrissey (Claims against commissioners patently false).

The message? There is indeed a lot at stake in the upcoming county elections. Bitterroot Citizens For Responsible Government, a non-partisan coalition of independent voters, was formed to promote the election of moderate candidates, regardless of party affiliation, who will work to foster a reasonable and rational approach to resolving the many issues facing Ravalli County residents. They note “…an alarming trend here in our valley. A minority of extremist voices is calling for abandonment of efforts by local governments to protect our property, our environment, and our rights. They call all laws ‘regulations’ and work to defeat even the most moderate voices speaking up for good government.”

These letters and non-partisan citizens’ group would strongly suggest retention of the three commissioners (Rokosch, Driscoll, Grandstaff) running for re-election, as well as our current county attorney (G. Corn), and sheriff (Hoffman).

John Carbin
Stevensville

Support for Corn

Dear Editor,

George Corn has dedicated the past 20 years of his life to prosecuting violent crimes and making Ravalli County a safer place to live. The attorneys in the County Attorney’s office see first-hand the long hours George works and the time he takes to make sure everyone does a good job. George is extremely driven yet very humble. Without fail he praises his deputies, staff, and law enforcement, nominates others for awards, and avoids taking any recognition or thanks himself.

George’s successful prosecutions are too numerous to list, but a sample of some violent offenders prosecuted by George personally shows his skill and determination. George prosecutes aggressively and demands sentences to protect victims and the community.

• Kenneth Whitlow (1993), convicted of kidnap and rape of a 6-year old child and prosecuted through 15 years of appeals, remains in prison.

• Frank Curtis (1993), imprisoned after killing his father and brother and injuring two others.

• Kippy Jo Hill (1998), convicted after strangling his mother-in-law to death.

• Alan Schoonover (2000) received two life sentences for incest.

• David Morgan (2001) convicted for shooting and injuring a Montana Highway Patrol Officer.

• Carl Yetman (2003) imprisoned for the shooting death of his wife.

• Blaine Fadness (2007) convicted on three counts of attempted homicide for drive-by shootings on Highway 93.

• Other sexual and violent offenders George has prosecuted: Robert Rose (assault and kidnapping); Kenneth Aiello (rape, incest, and sexual assault); Ray Williams (rape and sexual assault); Jason Houge (rape and sexual assault); and Bryce Peterson (kidnapping and assault).

• Domestic violence offenders prosecuted by George with great determination: Dustin Miller (felony assault and cruelty to animals); Audie Anderson (assault with a weapon and aggravated assault); Angel Morrison (stabbing of wife); and Robert Jetmore (fifth family member assault).

In addition to successful prosecutions, George helps develop programs to reduce violence.

• George worked with the Sheriff’s Office and S.A.F.E. to help fund Ravalli County’s first crime victim’s advocate in 1997.

• George strongly supported the Hamilton Soroptimists’ efforts to establish S.A.F.E. and build a domestic violence shelter in Hamilton in 2000. George faithfully lobbies for continued S.A.F.E. funding each year.

• George was elected as President of the Montana County Attorneys Association during the 2002-03 Legislature, during which time he worked on improving domestic violence laws.

• Together with other community partners, George worked to establish St. Patrick’s Hospital’s First STEP program to investigate rapes and sexual offenses.

• George worked with the Sheriff’s Office to establish an investigator in the County Attorney’s office in 2004 to enhance successful prosecution of sexual and violent crimes.

• George was appointed by Montana’s Governor to serve on the Department of Corrections Advisory Council in 2005.

• George conducts trainings on “Responding to Sexual Assault” and domestic violence prosecution. George presented for the Office of Violence Against Women in Polson and Thompson Falls in 2008.

• George worked with the late Judy Wang on successful legislation to strengthen aggravated assault laws. George gave a training and special tribute to Judy Wang at the April 2010 Domestic Violence Training conference in Missoula.

• George was invited and participated on a panel addressing changes to the criminal justice system over last two decades at the 2010 Annual Montana Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence Conference.

• George presents workshops on investigating strangulation cases.

• Guided by George, the County Attorneys’ Office has collected over $400,000 in criminal restitution and fines in the past 7 years alone. These funds are disbursed to victims, the State Crime Victim’s Compensation Fund, Ravalli County Drug Fund, and other programs.

• George requires his attorney deputies to attend trainings to improve their prosecution skills for sexual and violent offenses. George then commits office resources so his deputies can assist with boards and programs such S.A.F.E., Child Protective Teams, Emma’s House, Bitterroot CASA, and Ravalli County’s Suicide Prevention Coalition.

Finally, George has participated in the following important activities to make Ravalli County secure:

• George helped increase DUI penalties in 2001, has been a member of the Ravalli County DUI Task Force since its creation, and continues to advocate for stronger DUI laws to this day. See 2001, 2003, and 2010 Ravalli Republic articles.

• George has served on the Bitterroot Youth Homes Advisory Board, which opened a shelter in Hamilton to serve local children.

• George worked with District Court Judge Jim Haynes, Youth Court, and B.E.A.R. to help obtain funding for a mentoring program for youth in Ravalli County in 2010.

• George lobbied for support to open a mental health group home and crisis house in Hamilton in 2008 for Ravalli County residents. In 2010, George worked with the Sheriff and Hamilton Police to help obtain $310,000 in state funding for an emergency crisis facility next to Marcus Daly Memorial Hospital.

• George has served as a volunteer for Ravalli County Search & Rescue.

• George coached Kiwanis soccer, is a long-time member of the Bitterroot Cross Country Ski Club, and teaches ski classes every season.

• George is a faithful Rotary Club member.

• For the past 10 years George has taught personal protection (handgun safety) classes for Montana Handgunning, LLC.

George has accomplished much more toward protecting Ravalli County citizens in his 30 years in the Bitterroot than we can list here. We can’t imagine anyone more deserving of respectful for his faithful service to Ravalli County. We are proud to support him for re-election as County Attorney.

Geoff Mahar, Chief Deputy
John Bell, Deputy
Karen Mahar, Deputy
Angela Wetzsteon, Deputy
Daniel Browder, Deputy
Pete Clarkson, Investigator

Support for Fulbright

Dear Editor,

George Corn is Ravalli County’s incumbent County Attorney, running for reelection yet again in November 2010. He has held that office since 1992. His challenger is Bill Fulbright, currently Deputy County Attorney. Among the County Attorney’s responsibilities, he is charged with competently advising County Commissioners in the legalities of the measures they intend to consider and subsequently vote upon.

I’ll be the first to admit that George Corn is a polished and convincing public speaker. He’s had twenty years in public office to practice. However, I recognize him to be an accomplished ‘spin-doctor’, akin to the proverbial nineteenth century ‘snake-oil salesman’. A spin-doctor can take an otherwise unfavorable story, and just by eliminating a few negative facts, can make the outcome appear entirely different. A slick-talking politician like George Corn can make the electorate believe that his tenure as County Attorney has been a tale of unmitigated success.

In reality, there have been a total of 18 lawsuits filed against the county to date, all defended by George Corn’s office. All were settled in favor of the plaintiffs. In the past six years, the county paid out in settlements over $500,000. In the $200,000 settlement with plaintiff Gary Shook, George Corn implied it cost the county only $30,000 in uninsured cost, but it actually cost county taxpayers another $170,000 more, paid from the county’s self-insurance pool. See how a little spin can make all the difference in perception.

Incumbent George Corn’s challenger is Bill Fulbright, with 8 years as Ravalli County Deputy Attorney under his belt, and 12 years in private practice before that. His educational credentials are outstanding, receiving both an MBA in business and a BA in economics in addition to his law degree. He is eminently qualified to become our next Ravalli County Attorney.

I. Burns
Victor

Support for Ehli

Dear Editor,

As the November election draws near I wanted to share some thoughts about Ron Ehli, candidate for State Representative for House District 88.

Ron and I worked together for several years as Trustees of the Hamilton Rural Fire District. I am impressed with Ron's qualifications, management skills, work ethic, and common sense judgment. Ron is a people person, with proven leadership ability. If you have questions or need information about Ron he can be contacted at Box 765, Hamilton, Mt 59840, Phone 406-363- 3130, or Email: mtmutt@montana.com

If we elect Ron Ehli as our Representative from House District 88, we will be well represented in Helena. We need him there, so please vote for Ron Ehli in November.

Mick DeZel1
Hamilton

Vote out Langton

Dear Editor,

This letter is about Judge Jeffrey Langton’s Incompetence as our Ravalli District Court Judge. I went in front of him from 1995-2004 for educational issues for my son, which were never addressed. Not knowing his alcohol problems at the time. I had three teachers testify to the fact after they tested my son he could not read from 1st through 6th grade, at which point my Ex petitions the Court to let him move to Alaska, and with Joint Custody Judge Langton allows him to, still not addressing our son’s educational issues. After getting to Alaska I and an Uncle had to get Highway Patrol Officers and Attorneys to track my son and Ex down to take him to Court to get our son in school. When we finally did, their District Court Judge, who was not an alcoholic and was very mad, said, “You, Sir, school for your son or prison for you. This child will be going back to Montana as soon as you are investigated and this Montana Judge for not putting this boy in school.” Their honest Judge then told us how sorry he was for Langton’s poor decision. My son came to live with us, we then hired a retired teacher who was amazed when my boy went up four grade levels in 6 months time. This sweet lady did not charge, knowing his great struggles and how driven he is. Our son will complete his senior grade this December 2010 and has set himself up for college. He told his stepfather and me, “You spent so much getting me in school.” So in spite of our District Court Judge Langton’s terrible decision to not put our son in school, our son has succeeded in getting somewhere. Our Judge Langton should not be voted in again. We all have the right to a fair and honest Judge who will do what is right for our children. Please vote no November 2nd. I am sure my son is not the only unfair ruling he has made.

Cindy Schmidt
Florence

Support for Republican values

Dear Editor,

This country is at the crossroads of epic proportions and our County is no exception. The question is which road are we going to take? On one side, we have the Republican Party finally forced to go back to its conservative roots by the Tea Party Movement and conservatives within its own ranks. On the other side, we have the Democratic Party that has literally been usurped by anti-capitalist elements of all kinds, including the socialists. For those who are already screaming at me that I am being libelous and judgmental, I offer no apology. Being born and raised in a socialist country, groomed by its government and public schools to become a communist, I believe I am more than qualified to pass this judgment.

The Democratic Party is not the same party of the mid ‘80s that I once belonged to. I remember the biggest difference between the two parties used to be how much of our GDP should be spent on military vs. welfare or education. That is not the case anymore. The extremists within the Democratic Party have taken over and they are questioning and wanting to uproot our economic and therefore, our political system as well! The capitalism is not at fault for the economic mess we are in, nor is our Constitution which provides a main framework for it. It is the fault of amoral, unethical people, our own fellow citizens, who have been warping both for their own gains, economic or political. They have been hard at work while we all have been asleep or too busy making money so we can spend more in our new, consumer-driven, production-void “economy.”

If American capitalism, or our Constitution were at fault, millions of people including myself, would not be abandoning their socialist “utopias,” and coming to the shores of this great country. If the policies, which these “New” Democrats Driscoll, Rokosch, Grandstaff and Corn are promulgating, have been so disastrously unsuccessful and rejected by millions of people across the world, why vote for them? At least you have a choice for whom you vote for, which none of us in Eastern Europe had. I urge you to ask yourself, “Is our County truly better off with these three commissioners at its helm and Mr. Corn as our County Attorney, all pursuing ideology instead of public’s best interests?” The answer is clearly NO.

This is a heartfelt appeal to my fellow citizens, from someone who is anything but a conservative ideologue. It was the experience, not the ideology, that made me conservative. I rejected Marxism, even though they tried to brainwash me with it during my entire 12 years of schooling in Yugoslavia, as I saw with my own eyes that Socialism is anything but equality for all. We had massive unemployment (reaching over 30%) and majority of people barely surviving on their government salaries or subsidies (mostly financed with loans from the West). It was the experience of living and working in this country that made me reject the Democratic Party, because it stopped representing me and the interests of our nation, for the sake of special interests that keep it in power. Its demagoguery has Balkanized our nation and divided races and ethnic groups as well as economic classes against each other, for the sake of ensuring its political supremacy. This is very akin to what the Communist Party did to my native country resulting in a bloody civil war and its destruction (that’s why the term “Balkanization” - late Yugoslavia was on the Balkan peninsula).

I have personally come a full circle politically, and consider myself a Reagan Conservative because small government, strong private property rights, less taxation and fiscal responsibility is what has always worked in practice and enabled our nation to prosper. This is the same platform that the four Republican candidates – Foss, Kanenwisher, Stoltz and Fulbright – are running on, and I urge you that November 2nd you exercise your civic duty and vote for these authentic, honest individuals who are more than forthcoming as to where they stand. It is time to go back to the very foundations, legal, political and economic, that have made this nation the most prosperous nation on the face of this Earth and the beacon of freedom for all people to aspire to.

Alexandra Morton
Victor

Support for Driscoll

Dear Editor,

There are three things about Commissioner Driscoll everyone should know. They may sound corny to cynical people but they’re true. Anyone who has spent time with her knows it:

1) She’s committed to this valley and to us. Whether she is re-elected or not, you can be sure that Kathleen will be involved in helping people and making our community stronger. The commissioner’s job simply puts her in a position to do more.

2) She’s interested in everything that’s going on in the valley. Most politicians have one or two issues they’re passionate about. Kathleen’s not that way. She’s involved in nearly everything; always thinking about new ways for individuals, groups and government to work together to create businesses and services that will improve our lives. Our new mental health crisis center is a perfect example.

3) She seeks information from a wide variety of sources. She does what she thinks is right and is in the best interests of everyone, even when it conflicts with friends and supporters. It’s easy to vote against an opponent. It takes real courage to cast a vote you know will be unpopular with your peers and friends.

We residents of Ravalli County are a diverse group with strong ideas. We need commissioners who will listen to all of us and then vote once they’ve assimilated all the information; whether or not their vote satisfies the people who are yelling the loudest. Kathleen Driscoll exemplifies a dedicated public servant. If you like politicians you can bully or buy off, don’t vote for her. If you don’t, she deserves your vote.

Caroline Knight
Hamilton

Support for Moran

Dear Editor,

I've known Terry for many years and had the opportunity recently to serve with her on the board of a non-profit organization. She never hesitated to take on the most difficult and pressing issues. She approached these challenging issues with energy, attention to detail and exceptional problem solving skills. All of these are attributes that I believe we desperately need in the legislature.

Tom Schmit
Hamilton

Support for Moran

Dear Editor,

Who is Terry Moran? She dived into politics (candidate House District 88), her website www.VOTEMORANHD88 posts her resume. Who is this Terry Moran who wants to contribute her expertise in problem-solving and negotiations for the benefit of the economy, healthcare, veterans, education, etc. - what makes Terry who she is today? What motivates her?

Terry’s father, WWII-Vet, Wm. Hensleigh, was a survivor of “Battle of the Bulge”, where 100,000 Germans and 40,000 Allies lay dead and dying. No physical injuries, two-week respite; back on battlefield. Discharged 12/1945; subsequently he suffered excruciating headaches but he never registered this complaint with the VA. By 1956 the symptoms worsened. Diagnosis: neurological-deterioration (MS) which gradually destroyed parts of his brain. “Service Connected Disability” determination required an earlier record of developing symptoms. Thus the family was not eligible for VA assistance.

Her mother became breadwinner and caretaker. Six-month old Terry never knew a healthy father; Terry knows what SAFE, the battered-spouse and battered-family syndromes are and the struggles single-parent households encounter.

High-school years she carhopped; college-years she worked two summer jobs. Terry knows about “hard-earned dollars.” She will be as careful of the taxpayers’ money as though it is her own. Personally, she is a thrifty money-manager.  

The family motto: “Help people to help themselves.” Extend a helping hand to enable people to succeed, instilling hopefulness, self-esteem and dignity. Terry’s early life and nursing career experiences, combined with her skills in problem-solving, critical thinking and negotiation, will be an advantage when working on legislative issues – economy, healthcare, veterans, education, etc. – facing Ravalli County and Montana.

Terry focuses on the future, not the past. However, you need to know the life experiences that contribute to the formation of this dedicated, purpose-driven, spiritual adult that she is today!

I know of Terry’s early struggles; I am her mother.

Marie Hensleigh
Hamilton

What is a progressive?

Dear Editor,

The public often encounters this term used to describe Democratic Party office seekers. What does Progressive mean and how did it originate?

In the early twentieth century, Socialists fought hard to gain elected office in America in order to impose their undeniably leftist agenda. They operated closely in league with the American Communist Party. Their US Presidential candidate, Norman Thomas, led their ticket six times. Finally, in a 1944 policy speech, Thomas said, “The American public will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But, under the name of ‘Liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened”. He went on to say, “I no longer need to run as a presidential candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.”

Well, now we know what the title ‘Liberal’ represents, but how did ‘Liberal’ morph into today’s ‘Progressive’ moniker? The term Progressive is a euphemism. A euphemism is defined by Webster’s dictionary as “a mild or inoffensive term to express that which is disagreeable.” Today’s Socialists and Liberals chose Progressive as a less memorable name for their renewed twenty-first century drive to socialize America. ‘Progressive’ outwardly sounds so forward-looking and noble, one cannot mistake its intended implication. In reality, the Progressive movement simply offers the same time-worn Socialist agenda dating back to the past century; more government, over-regulation, higher taxes and leveling of wealth by taking from the prosperous and giving to those allegedly less fortunate.

Some may ask, how does Socialism differ from Marxism (Communism)? Communism’s author Karl Marx answered that question. He said, “Socialism is but a step on the path to pure Communism” (that elusive utopia never to be achieved on this earth). He is also quoted as saying, “Socialize medicine first, then all other activities of a nation will follow as night the day.” Didn’t President Obama just do that? He entered presidential office in the midst of recession and record joblessness, dire problems requiring his immediate attention. But what did he do first? He socialized healthcare, just as Karl Marx prescribed.

Now that we know what a “Progressive” is, how does the progressive movement apply itself here in Ravalli County? We know that our incumbent County Commissioners consider themselves Progressives, as does outsider Stewart Brandborg who apparently exercises considerable influence over their decisions and those of the Planning Board. One of Socialism’s principal goals is the elimination of private land ownership in America. Senate Bill S3663 currently before Congress proposes to designate $900 million of taxpayer money every year indefinitely to buy up American lands from private ownership and transfer them to the Federal Government. The bill also provides for land confiscation if owners refuse to sell. Progressive US Senator Harry Reid of Nevada sponsored this insidious bill.

Ravalli County Attorney George Corn’s hands are not clean either. While his job is to provide the County Commissioners with advice regarding the legality of their decisions, he has overstepped his authority in certain land issues. After the “1 per 2” ordinance was approved in 2006, Corn changed the language approved by voters from “a density of 1 residence per 2 acres” to “a minimum lot size of 2 acres,” retroactively stopping just about every subdivision proposal. For example, instead of 50 home lots with open space left over on 100 acres, any proposal had to be made up of inefficient 2-acre lots. This effectively brought building in Ravalli County to a halt. Corn made this sweeping change in a 3-page memo to the Planning Department full of legal double-talk to justify altering the plain language of the ordinance on which we voted. How arrogant, thinking he can tell us we are too dumb to read the simple words on a ballot measure. However, discouraging private investment in property supports one primary goal of his loyal Progressive supporters.

Our Progressive County Commissioners spent upwards of $800,000 to develop a master plan for the County. I remember reading portions of it and was astounded by its impractical proposals. Old Corvallis Road is a State thoroughfare carrying substantial traffic between Hamilton and Corvallis. In the event of Highway 93 closure, it provides an alternate route north to connect with Woodside Road or the Eastside Highway. Incredibly, the now infamous master plan proposed to block Old Corvallis Road and turn a section of it into a walk-in mall of winding pathways among trees and flowerbeds. Fortunately, concerned citizens took exception to this childish, impractical plan and gathered enough signatures to place it on the ballot. The plan was soundly rejected by Ravalli County voters, but don’t relax yet. If reelected, Progressive incumbent County Commissioners intend to revive it after a prescribed waiting period, as they are permitted to do by law.

Glenn Kimball
Corvallis

Support for Lake and Ehli

Dear Editor,

I read recently that a business in Billings was fined for hiring illegal immigrants in non-compliance with US law. I was surprised to find that several of my Libertarian friends thought that hiring illegals was none of the government’s business. They told me they attended a meeting where a Constitutional scholar and Libertarian candidate for President explained how the US Constitution does not provide for keeping people out of our country, and that borders just interfere with a person’s basic right to life and liberty. I’m beginning to appreciate that there’s a vast difference between Libertarian and Conservative ideals.

I asked them if NAFTA was a good idea, and they enthusiastically said yes. Libertarians see nothing wrong with exporting American jobs to Mexico and India where labor rates are lower. They seem to share the Socialist’s dream of a one-world economy, yet they profess to be conservative. I think Libertarians are just donning the conservative mantle temporarily to cash in on the groundswell of public dissatisfaction with our ‘Progressive’ Democratic leadership.

I intend to vote for Bob Lake and Ron Ehli. I know where they stand on vital issues, and I know they do not favor exporting American jobs to Mexico, Canada or anywhere else beyond our borders.

Marilyn Jones
Hamilton

Working on job situation

Dear Editor,

What on-going need jumps out at me when I look around the Bitterroot Valley? The continuing struggle for good paying jobs—the kind of jobs that not only put food on the table and a roof over our heads, but enough to buy those extras (like the big T.V. or a computer for the kids). A good paying job that when you leave in the morning you feel good about providing for your family. The kind of job that doesn’t require working at 2 more jobs just to make ends meet. The kind of job that pays the bills and leaves time for family and friends.

In the Bitterroot, we have a few large employers who offer some of those “really good jobs” with higher wages and benefits, but the backbone of our community is small, independently-owned businesses run by hardworking people who are struggling to provide for their own families as well as their employees’ families. It’s a juggling act that is performed everyday by small businesses. This is the struggle that I, as a commissioner, have been working on.

Over the past few years, we have had some employment victories: The building of the Ravalli Entrepreneurship Center which houses the Bitterroot Job Service, Bitterroot College program, the Ravalli County Economic Development Authority offices, and Falcon Asset Management Group. Recently, the commission approved the use of the County’s ARRA (Stimulus Funds) Bonds to assist RCEDA in securing funding for the expansion of their facility to include a research lab that Glaxo-Smith-Kline will lease—a true public-private partnership. Additionally, with one-time federal money, the commissioners created a $100,000 micro-loan program for small businesses where loans are made and then paid back into the fund to continue a self-sustaining loan fund for small business start-ups. In addition the Commissioners provided matching funds in the amount of $105,000 to the RCEDA USDA Intermediary Re-lending Program; match is also provided by the Montana Board of Investments.

But these are only a few of the possibilities. Over the past few years, I’ve traveled to numerous conferences to share ideas with fellow public officials and private business owners, looking for new ideas and possible solutions to our employment issues.

On September 13 and 14, I attended the Montana Economic Summit organized by Senator Max Baucus. At the Summit, Senator Baucus announced the award of a $627,000 grant to the Bitterroot Economic District to be used for economic projects in Missoula, Ravalli and Mineral Counties.

One of the seminars I attended at the Summit was on expansion of Internet access in rural areas. As one of the CEOs at the conference said, with the Internet “you are only one button away from the rest of the world.” Several of us talked about how to facilitate high speed internet access to rural areas. Think of it as a high speed freeway able to carry ideas, innovation, and new sales to other areas without the expense of opening a storefront or office. For the small business, this effectively levels the playing field.

According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Montana ranks number one in the country in entrepreneurship and business startups. This is due to the great Montana spirit coupled with wise leadership at the state capitol. Ravalli County could rank number one in Montana and I’m willing to work to make it happen.

Kathleen Driscoll
Ravalli County Commissioner

Time to utilize our forest biomass

Dear Editor,

We have a serious problem in Western Montana when it comes to management of our forest lands. The seemingly uncontrollable spread of the bark beetle has ravaged one of our most precious resources. We are left looking for different ways to use this so-called “woody biomass,” and one of the most promising of these is as a fuel source. While biomass energy production is a burgeoning industry in Montana, efforts in Washington D.C. essentially would eliminate the utilization of this potentially dangerous and otherwise unwanted resource.

The Environmental Protection Agency is currently in a rule-making process to curb the release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This “Tailoring Rule” would regulate woody biomass power generation facilities the same as conventional fossil fuel power plants. To date, woody biomass has been characterized as a renewable, carbon-neutral resource asserted by 113 scientists in a letter to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson. This type of policy change deserves a full public vetting in Congress, not a sly maneuver behind closed doors.

Here in Montana, we are just beginning to develop economically viable biomass generation facilities. We use biomass in our Fuel for Schools program to provide an alternative to the conventional gas-fired boilers. This program allows us to displace costs from heating our schools and use them instead to fund the actual education of students and has been implemented in 10 schools across western Montana. Furthermore, the harvest of these fuels puts foresters back to work who have borne the brunt of the decline in the timber industry over the past decade, and most notably during the past two years of economic recession.

Even more seriously, much of what the EPA calls biomass is located near houses and places of business. These hazardous fuels pose a serious risk to anyone who lives and works around them. We need to harvest these dead and dying trees to create a safer living environment and to help prevent the imminent dry summer forest fire. Last session, I co-sponsored and carried Senator Dave Lewis’s SB 198 in the House. This bill lowered taxes on biomass generation facilities up to 25 megawatts, putting these facilities into the same category as wind farms. The bill has been signed into law and will help new projects get up and running.

The bottom line when it comes to this issue is that we need to make the best we can out of a bad situation. Congressman Rehberg as well as both Senators Baucus and Tester have signed onto letters opposing the woody biomass provision in the proposed EPA rule. I urge you to call and ask them to ensure that this rule is not approved with the biomass provision included. They have taken the first step, but we need them to do more for our forests, timber industry, and potential alternative energy sources. We have watched for the past five years as our hillsides have gone from green to orange, and while we cannot change that fact, we can still put these resources to good use.

Western Montana and particularly the Darby area have the opportunity to provide a solution to a major problem. The jobs that a biomass generating plant would provide would help the community recover from the devastating effects of the mill closures over the past years. Such a facility would help our schools, our businesses and solve a serious problem all at the same time.

Please make the call.

Rep. Bob Lake, HD 88
Hamilton

County Commissioners blunder

Dear Editor,

A couple years ago, now seemingly forgotten by most citizens of Ravalli County, our incumbent County Commissioners perpetrated an unconscionable blunder. Worse, they defended their bad decision despite public outcry. I was a member of the Ravalli County Senior Citizens Coalition that objected to the exorbitant cost and flawed design of the new Ravalli County 911 Center.

The commissioners’ published cost estimate was $835,000, just to remodel an existing 1620 square foot basement under the county courthouse. One could build several upscale homes for that price. The location was poorly chosen because it floods. When all was said and done, cost at completion rose to $950,000, an approximate 14% overrun.

That would seem enough to reconsider the poor location, but no, our commissioners were determined not to admit their mistake. They forged ahead, whimsically adding a subsurface window well that completely obviates the security inherent in a windowless basement location. Despite his touted competence, the 911 Center’s architect located the center’s ventilation air intake in the easily accessed exterior window well. He placed the ventilation system’s exhaust port there also, cleverly recirculating discharged stale air back into the 911 Center. Now, a common prankster can take down our vital 911 Center by merely tossing a skunk carcass into the basement’s unsecured window well. In a minute or so, the 911 Center would have to be evacuated.

I, for one, am still upset over this travesty of common sense. Despite their awareness, the commissioners have not publicly acknowledged the problem they created, nor have they taken corrective action. I intend to vote against the incumbent Ravalli County Commissioners to replace them from a slate of more open, competent and responsible candidates. I urge you to vote for nominees Suzy Foss, Ron Stoltz and Matt Kanenwisher.

Robert Burns
Victor

Support for Republican candidates

Dear Editor,

I was at a recent meeting where the four County Republican candidates explained their intention to bring “coordination” to the table, when dealing with Federal Agencies managing our resources and wildlife in the county.

We have to elect Foss, Stoltz, Kanenwisher and Fulbright. Finally, candidates who actually have something new to bring to the table. This something new can save us from fire, uncontrolled wolf populations, and help our economy. This will be the easiest choice for voters this county has ever had.

Do we want more of the same? Over regulation that is stripping our property values and stopping our economy, while living with fires year after year until there is no forest to look at from Hwy 93, or do we want leadership that will actually earn their keep, do something to protect us, and save our forests and wildlife.

Vote for our Republican commissioner candidates, and Bill Fulbright, in the general election Nov. 2. The fate of Ravalli County depends on getting these people in office!

Lilya McAlister
Stevensville

Fulbright not suited to be County Attorney

Dear Editor,

The Sept 7 Ravalli Republic article entitled “Malpractice suits a factor in Fulbright bankruptcy” makes it clear that Ravalli County Attorney candidate Bill Fulbright misled not only the newspaper, but also county citizens -- including his own political supporters – in an interview with then-Ravalli Republic editor Perry Backus published August 4. At that time, Fulbright cited a $67,000 student loan debt as the reason he filed bankruptcy in 2003 – but failed to mention that, at the time of the filing, $305,762 in legal judgments were pending against him for professional malpractice as an attorney. Fulbright's deception is shocking, as are his malpractice cases. According to the Sept 7 Ravalli Republic article, in one case a default judgment of $250,000, plus court costs, was awarded to the plaintiff in 2002 -- after Fulbright failed to respond to court papers served him regarding the case.

Fulbright’s bankruptcy apparently means he will not have to pay this judgment or the one for $55,000, both in the state of California, where he formerly practiced law. Yet the candidate’s web site offers him as the solution to what it claims are his opponent’s previous “’legal’ opinions [that] have cost our county 100’s of thousands of our dollars.” The Fulbright web site also claims “Bad legal advice leads to bad decisions, which lead to costly lawsuits – at taxpayer expense.” In view of Fulbright’s own record of bad decisions, these statements are at best ironic, and at worst, evidence that he is in denial about his own professional issues.

It should also be noted that no one who works with Fulbright every day in the Ravalli County Attorney’s office thinks he should be elected County Attorney. All five other attorneys there not running for office – and who know Fulbright better professionally than the electorate ever will -- feel strongly enough about the election to appear in ads in local papers supporting Fulbright’s opponent, County Attorney George Corn. All of those attorneys have also endorsed George Corn on his web site.

Fulbright’s web site opens with the statement, “After 20 years, now is the time for a new County Attorney.” I don’t think so. I am offended by Fulbright’s disingenuous lack of transparency with the citizens of Ravalli County, and I don’t think he sets the kind of example I want to see in a County Attorney. Indeed, after George Corn’s 20 years of service as County Attorney, there is every reason to vote to keep him in office. He is a respected and proven prosecutor and civil attorney. He has served the county with openness, integrity and respect for the courts and the law. He deserves our votes in the November election.

Chris Love
Corvallis

Support for Corn

Dear Editor,

I do not have much use for political parties – Democrat, Republican or Tea Party. They all stir up divisiveness. I am much more comfortable voting for a person I trust with a record I trust, regardless of party. George Corn has earned my trust, and I will vote for him for County Attorney without regard to his party affiliation.

I know George to be a man of his word, dedicated to serving both the law and the citizens of Ravalli County. When I served as Executive Director of Valley Veterans Service Center (VVSC), I saw this dual dedication play out in a unique way. Last year I asked George, a veteran himself, to explore whether Montana law would allow Ravalli County to put before voters a proposed mill levy to support the Valley Veterans Service Center. The Center had assisted several thousand veterans of all wars since opening in 2006, it was drastically cutting claim turn-around time and it was achieving a high success rate on its claims. VA decisions regarding local veterans’ claims were bringing literally millions of dollars into the county annually. Yet as the VVC grew, it faced an uncertain future surviving on private donations alone.

George Corn studied the law and determined that it did allow for a veterans’ mill levy to be brought before county voters. His office wrote a mill levy proposal supporting the VVSC, and I sought support from commissioners to place it on the ballot.  

George Corn’s legal response to my request was not only respectful of Montana law, but also in touch with the will of county citizens: Last May voters passed the veterans’ mill levy by an unprecedented 72%. For reasons such as this responsive use of the law to benefit our county, I support George Corn for another term as County Attorney -- and I encourage all county citizens, veteran or otherwise, to do the same.

Ron Skinner
Corvallis

Support for Foss

Dear Editor,

I am appalled at the ads and the letters I have seen in our local papers this week. I have been working with the Republican candidates for a year. They all run a clean race. This is my first time, since I moved to MT, being here for an election from beginning to end. I have lived in six states in this great union. I have never seen anything like this. I guess I can take solace in the fact that they must know Suzy is going to be elected, and are scared. Using a military helmet in an ad? Come on. We are not children. Don’t insult the voters of this County. I first met Suzy when she was a Precinct Person in Charlos Heights. I knew from the start she was a leader. Common sense, good person, fair, a work horse, family oriented, cares deeply about the future of this county, a Christian woman. These are just a few of the things that come to mind, when I think of Suzy. When I first moved here, four years ago, someone said MT would be the biggest gray state in the union, if we didn’t change our ways. That scares the hell out of me. I heard Jim Roskosch, at a meeting, say, “I don’t care if my children leave this state for jobs, as long as they come back home.” When, when Jim is gone, when his children retire? I know our commissioner candidates are not looking to over populate this county. All they want to do is save us money, and make jobs available so that our children and grandchildren don’t feel they have to move out of the area. I also know that they know every one of our Legislators and Senators and are already working with them to better Ravalli County. I don’t want to think about what will happen, if we continue to pick animals over people. Vote conservative, vote Republican on Oct. 4 (absentees) and November 2nd.

Lilya McAlister
Stevensville

Support for Republicans

Dear Editor,

Letters come and letters go. I have seen support letters for commissioner candidates, sheriff, county attorney. We have five fabulous candidates for Senate and State Legislature, not to mention a Congressman, Denny Rehberg, who has been on two state tours, and been in Ravalli County four times in the last couple of months. I have been to numerous meetings, fundraisers, forums, debates. I have listened to these men, and gotten to know them. Pat Connell, Gary MacLaren, Ron Ehli, Ed Greef and Bob Lake are the kind of men we want working for us in Helena. I know they would appreciate your vote. It is a must that we take over the house and the senate in this state. Please vote Republican Nov 2.

Lilya McAlister
Stevensville

Be wary of a ‘wolf in sheep’s clothing’

Dear Editor,

Many of us know quite a bit about one of the candidates for Supreme Court, Nels Swandal, because of his record as a District Judge. But the other candidate in the race is a lawyer from Helena that we’ve heard little from except for her backing from extreme environmental groups and left-wing unions. That is until I saw the letter to the editor in the Missoulian from our former Republican(?) Governor Marc Racicot in support of Beth Baker’s candidacy. 

Apparently, Baker and Racicot became friends when she worked for him in the Justice Department. So instead of standing on any kind of principle to ensure that Montana gets a strong, freedom-oriented Justice on the court, Racicot decided to work to elect his good friend, liberal lawyer Beth Baker. That’s absolutely the kind of good old boy cronyism that we have been fighting daily from the politicians in Washington, D.C. I guess from Racicot I shouldn’t be surprised. You see, since he left Montana after the deregulation debacle, our former Governor has been spending his days roaming Washington, D.C. as a lobbyist with a high-powered client list filled with names like Enron. 

The people of Montana deserve better than the Washington, D.C. cronyism that Marc Racicot is showing in his endorsement of liberal lawyer Beth Baker and her extreme environmentalist friends. While our mothers always warned us to be wary of a “wolf in sheep’s clothing,” remember before you vote in this election to also be prepared for the “Republican in name only,” Marc Racicot. The Supreme Court is too important for us to fall for those tricks. They may work for Racicot’s lobbyist friends, but we must remain diligent to keep another liberal lawyer off of the bench.

Jennifer Olsen
Billings

Support for Corn

Dear Editor,

Ravalli County Attorney, George Corn, is seeking re-election, having held this position since 1991. I quickly developed respect for him in this role as he demonstrated that he was a strong law and order proponent with the ability to apply this needed approach.

As a professional firearms instructor, one of the classes I offer, Basic Handgun and Use of Force, involves me teaching the segment on handgun use and George Corn teaching the one on legal and justifiable use of force. He has done this since 1999 following the retirement of my original partner, former Ravalli County Sheriff Jay Printz. The class continues to meet the training requirement for a Montana Concealed Weapons permit.

There is much concern among voters as to where candidates stand on issues important to them. George Corn, I can say with the conviction of extended experience, is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. As a former Army Ranger, he has an excellent firearms background and, as co-instructor in our class, he backs up his support for good citizens’ right to keep and bear arms.

He has just completed his 12th year in this teaching role with me pro bono and on his own time. The National Rifle Association has recognized him for his contribution.

I have strong respect for the job George has done as our County Attorney and a great appreciation for the top flight job he does in our firearms class, both for myself and the good citizens who train with us.

In November, I will again vote for George Corn for Ravalli County Attorney.

Mark Kowack, President
Montana Handgunning, LLC
Hamilton

Support for Fulbright

Dear Editor,

I am writing this letter urging support for the election of Bill Fulbright as County Attorney. Bill is a dedicated professional who has given exemplary service to the citizens of Ravalli County.

When elected County Attorney he will provide legal counsel to the Commissioners that will help avoid costly lawsuits, protect your rights, and continue to prosecute predators and other criminals to the fullest extent of the law.

Don't only take my word on Bill's qualifications. As quoted in the Ravalli Republic in 2007 when Bill Fulbright received the 2007 Montana Outstanding Prosecutor of the Year Award, George Corn said, "Bill's professionalism, his compassion working with the victims, his expertise in these cases, all helped him win this award" and, "We are fortunate to have such a dedicated professional on our staff."

This is the kind of person we need leading out County Attorney's office into the future. I urge you once again to vote for Bill Fulbright as our next County Attorney.

Carol Fowler
Stevensville

Leaders should be cutting costs, not raising taxes

Dear Editor,

Of any public service that we as citizens in Ravalli County must be aware of and fully support, emergency services have to be at the top of the list with the citizens and our County Commissioners. The County Sheriff’s Department, EMT and ambulance service, and of course our local volunteer fire departments.

For a county our size 26 deputies is not enough manpower to safely cover this area. The 26 deputies cover two shifts every day and that includes coverage for days off, vacation, sick days, and miscellaneous call-ins for unscheduled time off, detectives, juvenile services, traffic officer and court. Our Sheriff’s deputies need vehicles replaced on a regular rotation, facility maintenance, jail functions and we need decent pay for our deputies. The current situation is unsafe for all of us, elders, children, adults, men and women of both political parties.

Our fire and ambulance services need aging equipment replaced on a regular basis. Second to emergency services our County government must maintain our country roads and public water systems

As a retired citizen of Ravalli County, I personally don't benefit from a freshly repainted, refurbished school. I don't need County parks or ball fields. In these financially tough times basic services with no frills is where my tax dollars should be spent. It is my opinion that continually raising taxes on citizens instead of cutting costs is an indication of people in management positions who are unequal to the task.

Fred Fowler
Stevensville

Support for Moran

Dear Editor,

Terry Moran is the kind of person we need in the Legislature, especially when difficult choices have to be made. She is very intelligent and conducts herself with great integrity. She has been involved in the community for a long time and shown that she is a pragmatic problem solver, a good communicator and team player. Terry is open-minded and respects others.

Steve Powell
Hamilton

Free money?

Dear Editor,

In public finance, there is no such thing as “free money” as our incumbent Ravalli County Commissioners would have us believe. While currency continues to spew off the printing presses in Washington DC, dollars are only as valuable as the US economy underlying them. America is experiencing a prolonged recession, with available jobs still declining at an alarming rate. We are suffering from years of government mismanagement. Now, we as Americans must learn to prioritize our spending in order to survive and again prosper. To accomplish that, we must choose our leaders wisely.

Here in Ravalli County, we must elect only fiscally responsible officials. Carlotta Grandstaff continues to expound about the county’s dependence upon grants, like it’s “free money” inexhaustibly available from Washington. Ravalli County is presently surviving only because it currently receives $22 million in grants to supplement the county budget. At every opportunity, Grandstaff emphasizes how wonderful grants are for county taxpayers because it’s “not your tax dollars.”

Well, Carlotta, we have a surprise for you. Those grants are indirectly funded by tax dollars collected from working Americans. Grants are rapidly drying up because our Federal and State governments are essentially broke and deeply in debt. In January, the Montana State Legislature opens with a $368 million shortfall, all due to a 400% growth in state spending in just five years. The 2011 legislature must impose drastic cuts to balance the budget.

Carlotta, you seem to harbor another misconception. More government jobs do not help the economy. They are an ‘expense’, not contributing to economic health. Ravalli County desperately needs private sector jobs, jobs that produce marketable products. Idaho’s timber industry is thriving, as are the Wyoming and Dakota economies. Many Montanans are leaving to find jobs in other states.

Vote for fiscal responsibility. Vote Suzy Foss for Ravalli County Commissioner.

Charlotte Kissinger
Hamilton

Stoltz and Kanenwisher not good choices

Dear Editor,

In an earlier letter to the editor, I described the falsehoods being spread by Suzy Foss, Matt Kanenwisher, Ron Stoltz and Bill Fulbright. But I emphasized the flaws in Foss and Fulbright’s campaigns. Since then numerous other citizens of Ravalli County have spoken up in print. If you are still inclined to vote for Foss or Fulbright, you have simply not paid attention in the last month. But this letter deals with facts not well known about Ron Stoltz and Matt Kanenwisher. Most of all, these two are Libertarians masquerading as Republicans.

Both Stoltz and Kanenwisher are proud members of Celebrating Conservatism. That means they endorse the requirement that group would impose on us of a mandatory three-week militia training for all men and women over 18 in Ravalli County each year under the supervision of the Sheriff. How’s that for “restoring our liberty?” They would stop any federal official entering the County without the prior written permission of the Sheriff. Folks, our County is 73% owned by the federal government. No County Ag guys? No Forestry Service people? No US military? They would enthusiastically legalize fully automatic weapons and silencers. They would legalize stinger missiles for our homegrown militias to shoot down all those UN black helicopters surveying our Valley for a takeover. Gee, maybe that’s the secret agenda of WUI. I am not making this up. They want a Ravalli County posse.

Neither Ron Stoltz nor Matt Kanenwisher have ever worked in government before. Never sat on a planning board, park board, library board. They have no executive experience. None. No military experience. No higher education degrees. Well, Ron Stoltz did have his own gravel trucking business. But he went bankrupt in 2002, owing almost $600,000 with declared assets of really only his home. He jilted Ravalli County of taxes owed; he left employees dangling without paying workers compensation. Since then, after he collected unemployment, he has worked for his parents. Does that qualify him to run our multi-million dollar County business?

And Matt Kanenwisher is a pup. He has no relevant experience. None. He’s trained as a nurse but not working in that field, if at all. But he does have anger. If you’ve been going to the candidate forums, you’ve witnessed Kanenwisher’s anger with anybody that doesn’t agree with him. Matt, how do you think you’re going to represent all voters of Ravalli County, even those who did not vote for you as a Commissioner, if you stalk opponents in parking lots after the forums? There is no way this guy can represent Ravalli County, ever!

Richard Morrisey
Stevensville

Current Commission is balanced

Dear Editor,

The current election dialogue in Ravalli County has become mighty confusing with the infusion from the extreme right of the political spectrum four candidates – three for the county commission, one for county attorney – running under the banner of the Republican Party when it’s obvious they’re RINOs (Republicans in Name Only). One wonders how and why the Republican Party has allowed these extremists to co-opt, and corrupt, their banner. Or, even worse, what the tragic result for all, including Republicans, would be should any of them get elected.

Two factors compound this issue. One is that the term RINO is normally applied to those who run as Republicans but who demonstrate more moderate, middle-of-the-road positions on many issues. The second is that the Republican Party itself, publicly at least, hasn’t dealt with the issue of RINOs at the other end of the spectrum.

Which raises the question, why has the Republican Party allowed itself to be invaded, indeed co-opted, by extreme rightists whose agendas truly reflect extremism outside the historic stance of the Republican Party. Shouldn’t the Republican leadership be helping the public out here by clarifying that people like Matt Kanenwisher and Suzy Foss (proponents of county supremacy), Ron Stoltz (who decries even laws and regulations designed to protect the public at large), and William Fulbright (also a proponent of county supremacy) as extreme RINOs – so far to the extreme right outside the fundamental stance of the Republican Party that they should be running as something other than Republican? For sure, they’re not Republicans in the traditional sense.

We have balance in the county commission right now – two Republican holdovers, two Democrats and an Independent. That’s why incumbents Jim Rokosch and Kathleen Driscoll, Democrats, and Carlotta Grandstaff, an Independent, should be re-elected.

Dale Burk
Stevensville

Support for Greef

Dear Editor,

I support Ed Greef for HD-90 because I know him to be a man of honor and integrity. Ed possesses the abilities to bring people together for the common good and is very respectful of other's opinions and ideas. I learned to appreciate Ed's abilities while serving on committees with him at the Florence Carlton Community Church where he serves as the church treasurer. With the skills and abilities I have witnessed, I believe Ed will be a very valuable asset at the State Legislature. He will take the skills and abilities he has displayed in business and committee work to represent the Bitterroot Valley and the State of Montana in a manner we can all be proud of. He is hard-working and dedicated to doing what is right. Ed Greef is the right choice for HD-90.

Curt Belts
Florence

Commissioners unresponsive

Dear Editor,

County Commissioners, surely you realize by now that you botched the new 911 Center. Furthermore, you undoubtedly realize that nearly everyone in Ravalli County is aware of your mistake. You spent $950,000 to construct a facility that floods, and which cannot resist even the attack of a common prankster. It’s inconceivable that in over a year since project completion you haven’t acknowledged the problem nor taken corrective action.

Prior to commencement of construction, a coalition of Ravalli County seniors recognized the 911 Center’s design flaws, and made Commissioners aware of their concerns. Their principal objection was the window well that obviates all the security inherent in a windowless basement location. Further compromising security, the architect foolishly placed the center’s ventilation air intake and exhaust ports within the window well. In minutes, a common prankster could shut down our vital 911 Center by tossing a skunk carcass into the unsecured well. It’s not pleasant to contemplate what a dedicated terrorist might do.

Senior delegates voiced their concerns to Commissioner Carlotta Grandstaff. She dismissed them with a flurry of excuses. When seeking to verify her claims, they were proven to be untrue. The center was not designed to a State code that prescribes security measures, and inclusion of the superfluous window well was not a 911 worker’s union “deal buster” as she claimed. Furthermore, when interviewed by Ravalli Republic reporter John Cramer, Grandstaff said (paraphrased), “I just can’t take them (seniors) seriously.”

Since after all this time it’s unlikely that our incumbent commissioners will acknowledge responsibility for their mistake, it will be up to our newly elected commissioners to take corrective action to restore our vital 911 Center to its intended level of security.

Elect responsible County Commissioners. Vote for Suzy Foss, Matt Kanenwisher and Ron Stoltz.

Rolf Wigaard
Hamilton

Support for Democratic values

Dear Editor,

As the years go by, I worry about how my children and grandchildren will live in such a defiled world. So when I decide to vote for a candidate it is always based on whether they are going to support issues that protect and enhance human life or if they stand for policies that would actually hurt our planet and society and ultimately hurt our children’s future. When I look at the two main political parties, it is clear that the Republican Party candidates are voted into office with big business money and then they vote in favor of big business policy. On the other hand, the Democratic Party is the party of the people. Most of their campaign contributions come from everyday citizens and their public policy is in support of the environment and the needs of the people first and foremost.

During the George W. Bush Administration, the politicians supported by big business were bold and unrelenting in their mission. They proposed a Clear Skies Act (cunning name), that would relax pollution standards, allowing big business to pollute more (Environmental Defense Fund, April 3, 2003), putting 221 million tons more mercury in the air by 2020, and 52 million tons of SO2 (acid rain) in the air by 2020 according to Wikipedia. An article in Highbeam Research, January 2003, called it “the biggest rollback in environmental enforcement in 30 years.” The National Council of Churches (NCC April 22, 2004) was so upset they wrote G.W. Bush a letter representing 100,000 congregations from all over the country and stated it, “goes against Christian principles of stewardship and care of God’s creation and God’s children.” The Act left thousands of communities at greater risk and powerless to protect themselves when in 2007 the Bush administration instructed the EPA to deny states requesting stricter environmental laws (Source: Center for Biological Diversity June 30, 2009), thus protecting big business polluters even more.

The Republican Party states they stand for lower taxes, but they pass laws that highly favor the wealthy and disadvantage the middle and lower classes. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities’ April 2004 report, an examination of the Bush tax cut proposals clearly showed that the richest people in the country got the greatest benefit. The middle class would have an after-tax income increase of 2.3%, an average of $647.00. The top 1% income earners would have an after-tax income increase of 5.3% for an average of $34,992.00. The over $1 million income earners would increase their after-tax income at 6.4%, for an average of $123,592.00. Almost three times the tax break of the middle class in percentage and nearly 200 times per person in dollars. According to the Huffington Post (July 28, 2008), “The Bush tax cuts expire in 2010 and would soon cost over $200 billion a year” to continue them. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, April 2009, “considering both the direct cost of the tax cuts and associated increase in interest payments the tax cuts would increase the deficit by nearly $4 trillion between 2005 and 2014.” The Democrats want to let the affluent tax cuts expire on the Bush expiration date and improve on tax cuts for 98% of us.

The National Republican Party often states they are for spending less tax dollars. Are you kidding me? When G.W. Bush took office, according to wiki.answers.com, he inherited a $230 billion surplus from Democratic President Clinton and Bush left office, according to the Huffington Post (February 24, 2009) with a huge deficit of $1.3 trillion. According to the Center for American Progress (August 25, 2009), the debt was mostly due to tax cuts for the rich, two wars and a huge downturn in the economy. And yes, the debt is growing as Obama tries to infuse our economy with jobs and help those without jobs. For eight years Bush created this mess and it can’t be fixed in just two years, but at least our economy is not as bad as it would have been without any government help. Our tax dollars are now being spent on us, improved national infrastructure, tax reductions for people and businesses, job training, and unemployment assistance.

Republican candidates often tout that they want smaller government, but compare the Clinton Administration to the Bush Administration: Clinton decreased the size of government and the Bush Administration increased the size of government. According to reviewjournal.com (Oct. 9, 2006) “total real discretionary outlay will increase 35.8% under Bush (FY2001-06), by contrast they declined by 8.2% under Clinton (FY 1993-1998). According to (clinton4.nara.gov), Clinton cut “377,000 employees from the federal budget.”

On the other hand the Democrats support very good public policy and it actually fulfills the values in the Bible, “defend the poor and the orphan; do justice to the afflicted and the needy.” Psalm 82:3. If you have benefited from any of the following programs listed, thank Democrats, and vote for Democrats at election time, vote for the people’s party.

Social Security
Medicare
Medicaid
Minimum Wage Law
Unemployment Compensation Act
GI Bill
Head Start
Water Quality Act
Clean Air Act
Workers Compensation
School Lunch Program
40 hour work week
Civil Rights Act 1964

Phyllis Bookbinder
Corvallis

Support for Moran

Dear Editor,

Terry Moran has a long history of public service in Ravalli County. The recent mailer sent out by the Montana Republican Party is their attempt to discredit a well respected member of our community. This is just one of the many misleading and inaccurate "one size fits all" mailers that Montana Republicans are mailing in an attempt to turn voters against several Democratic candidates across the state. Only the names and pictures are different.

We guess that this kind of meanness is what Republicans have to do when they don't have any solutions to the devastating economic problems that their political policies have caused.

Democrats DO have proposals that help Montana, but even more importantly, we have a solid track record when it comes to success. Montana is only one of two states in the nation with a positive bank balance; the U.S. Chamber of Commerce rates Montana number one in business start-ups; the Tax Foundation says Montana has the eighth best good business tax structure.

Terry Moran has actively worked to improve life in the Bitterroot Valley. She currently is working with the Chamber of Commerce to improve tourism here in the Valley and thus create jobs, serving on the Chamber's Marketing and Tourism Committee. As an independent educator with a strong sense of family values, she has facilitated a parenting program at Marcus Daly Memorial Hospital entitled "How to Talk So Kids Will Listen, and Listen So Kids Will Talk." Terry has made many other contributions to the Bitterroot Valley in the areas of education, medicine, and church youth.

Terry has worked hard for Ravalli County as an involved citizen. Just think how much more good she can do as our State Representative.

Ruth and John Hazelton, Nancy and Ron Osborn, Ann Curran, Ruth Peterson, Naomi Hardison, Audrey Lawrence, Sybil Ibey, Beverly Johnson, Hazel Ayers, Anita Dianda, Georgianna Taylor, Barbara Stewart, Winslow S. Caughey
Hamilton

Republicans spreading false allegations

Dear Editor,

The Montana Republican Legislative Campaign Committee is spreading false allegations about Terry Moran’s candidacy for House District 88 Representative. This smear campaign is ugly, ridiculous, and completely untrue. Specifically, the MRLCC mailed a campaign flyer to absentee voters in HD 88 saying, among other things, that Terry would bankrupt the state and that she is endorsed by “ultra-liberal groups.”

The fabrications and falsehoods in this flyer are so outrageous that even Republican Representative Gary MacLaren, whose name is on the mailing, has objected. He says he did not know about the nature of this flyer, that he did not approve of it, and that, as a result, he would have the MRLCC remove his name as treasurer. While Terry has expressed her appreciation to Representative MacLaren for his objection to this piece, the blatant lies it contains cannot go uncorrected.

So I will state for the record that it would not be possible for Terry -- or any other candidate or elected official of any party -- to “bankrupt Montana” for the simple reason that the Montana Constitution requires a balanced budget. Let me repeat: The Montana Constitution requires a balanced budget, which is why Montana is one of only two states in the entire nation not operating at a deficit. I add that Terry supports Governor Schweitzer’s fiscally responsible leadership and note that, on his watch, Montana has been named “Fastest Climber” by Forbes Magazine. In addition, we have seen Montana’s national business-friendly ranking rise from 42nd to 13th and, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, we are the top entrepreneurship state in the country and have more business start-ups than any other state.

For the record, the only endorsement from a political action group that Terry’s campaign has received is from Montana Conservation Voters -- not an “ultra-liberal” group by any stretch of the imagination. I will add that Terry believes in good government and clean campaigning, and that all contributions to her campaign, whether from ophthalmologists, PAC’s that have not endorsed her, teachers, nurses or others, are public information and can be viewed at the Montana Political Practices website.

It is very, very unfortunate that the MRLCC chose to distribute such a flyer. It is worse that they did so not only in HD 88 but in at least 10 other districts in Montana. That’s right: they used these same generic and completely untrue statements to attack other candidates. In Terry’s case, some of their attacks defy logic, such as their reference to media reports from 2009 as “evidence” supporting their allegations. The Montana Republican Legislative Campaign Committee apparently overlooked or chose to ignore the fact that Terry did not even enter politics until 2010! So much for their “evidence.”

More importantly, though, taking negative smear-tactics campaigning to the level of distributing complete lies, as demonstrated here, is unacceptable and should not be condoned by anyone. It corrupts our political process and damages voter confidence in our electoral system.

Terry Moran has worked hard in this campaign for the right to serve as your representative to the Montana State Legislature, and it has been her pleasure to do so. She has knocked on the doors of thousands of households. She has listened and taken to heart your concerns and opinions about the serious issues that challenge us all. And time after time, she has heard people say two things. The first is that they think the State of Montana is doing a good job managing its budget. But the second is that they’re so sick and tired of negative campaigning -- of political games and a lack of civility in the political world -- that they aren’t even sure they’re going to vote any more.

I suggest another strategy for voters since you, the citizens, are the boss. Stand up and say, “I will not tolerate this nasty behavior.” We are all, first and foremost, Montanans and Americans, not Democrats, Republicans or Libertarians. And I firmly believe that those of us who are elected are elected for one reason and one reason only: to support legislation and a balanced state budget that will serve the best interests of all Montanans.

On November 2, please cast your vote for Terry Moran, Representative, House District 88.

Thank you for your interest in good government. If you have any questions, you can talk to Terry directly at 363-7656 or visit her website http://www.votemoranhd88.com.

John Meakin
Stevensville

Vote against I-161

Dear Editor,

I’m an outfitter who makes use of the outfitter set-aside licenses, which I-161 would abolish. For us, outfitting is a family business, which we do for one week of the five-week big-game season on the family ranch. For years we have split the five-week season with 2-? weeks for public hunting; 1-? weeks for family, guests and employees; and one week for outfitting.

Last October, during an early blast of winter, we had 500 to 600 elk camped on our hay fields for a three-day period, eating crop aftermath we’d saved for winter feed for the cattle enterprise. This is a real cost to the ranch, already a business of slim profit margins, for which outfitting helps to compensate.

We have been outfitting for basically the same group of hunters for about thirty years – ethical, safe hunters who know the ranch and the demands of hunting on the ranch. Without the outfitter-sponsored licenses we could not rely on this return group.

If I-161 passes it will not increase public access to hunting on our ranch. It will make my job as an outfitter more demanding. To secure ten clients, how many must apply for licenses? Where do I find them? What if more draw than we have space for? I expect our clients would include new hunters who don’t know the group or the area, and whose abilities and ethics are unknown to us.

Outfitter-sponsored licenses are one of the elements that make the ranch work. I will vote against I-161.

Scott Hibbard
Helena

Sometimes I wonder

Dear Editor,

Election time is nearing when less then half the voters go to the polls. Usually they cast their ballot for someone they don’t know and have never met. I’d be willing to bet it is the very rare individual ballot caster who has ever vetted a candidate to find out if there are any skeletons hidden in the closet. They don’t even try to find out if the candidate has the necessary qualifications to serve in public office.

7-4-2201. General qualifications for county office. A person is not eligible for a county office who at the time of the election is not:

(1) of voting age required by the Montana constitution;

(2) a citizen of the state; and

(3) an elector of the county in which the duties of the office are to be exercised; or

(4) in case of an office consolidated between two or more counties, an elector in one of the counties in which the duties of the office are to be exercised.

If you want to be a barber in Montana, you are required to attend barbers school, and you must obtain a license from the State of Montana.

If you want to be a doctor in Montana, you must have a degree in medicine from a medical school, and you have to obtain a license from the State of Montana.

If you want to be a nurse, you need a degree in nursing from an authorized school, and you have to take a test and pass your State of Montana Boards before you can be employed as a nurse.

If you want to be a lawyer, you have to have graduated from a law school and passed the State Bar of Montana before you are licensed to handle legal matters for the public.

If you want to be a teacher, you need a degree in education from a college, and you are required to maintain your proficiency by acquiring fifteen hours of college courses in your teaching field every three years.

If you want to be a veterinarian, and take care of animals, it is at least seven years of higher education and passing state requirements before you are turned loose on the horses, cows, dogs and cats.

These are only a few of the professions that require the licensee to have some degree of education in his professed profession before he can practice. Now the government requires the practitioners of nearly all professions to take continuing education courses in their field in order to maintain their license to practice.

Why aren’t elected public officials, who manage millions of our tax dollars, pass laws, rules and regulations to govern the body politic, required to display some proficiency in how the office they seek should be operated? Public schools have curtailed the teaching of civics or government in our high schools. These courses are not required subjects for most college degrees. It’s my guess that several people holding public office at the present time have never had the opportunity to study civics or government in their educational efforts. Don’t you think that before a twenty-one year old citizen of the state and county is allowed to run for office they should be required to exhibit some degree of skill for serving in that office?

It would be a safe guess that most candidates for a county office do not really understand how the office operates, or how they are to manage the mega amounts of money in their charge. It is safe to assume that most people who run for local political office have never handled sums that extend into the several millions of dollars. I wonder if the answer is, "They are qualified citizens, and we just have to let them learn on the job."

Off the top of my head I’m not sure, but there must be some countries that require candidates to have a modicum of knowledge about the office they seek. I don’t think anyone would give the keys to their Lincoln Centennial to a 21-year-old neighbor who has never driven an automobile, and let him take it for a drive. Yet we are willing to turn the running of our government over to any citizen beyond the age of 21 who has not exhibited any evidence that he/she knows how to run a multi-million-dollar institution.

In my limited 62 years of voting I have never heard a candidate announce that he had taken a test in the way our government should be run, and passed it with flying colors. In fact I have never heard any candidate say they ever took any proficiency test for the operation of the office they were seeking.

I don’t think knowledge of the office will ever be required of candidates because the people who hold the offices that make the laws might be required to take the proficiency test before they could pass any laws. Not having any knowledge of how the office you seek should be run, makes you an amateur. Maybe our form of government is so pure it can be run properly by amateurs, but don’t bet on it.

Everybody knows what we need to run our government is knowledgeable persons, dedicated to doing what is best for the people they represent. Sometimes I wonder why it has been so long since we have had people with those qualities running our government.

John Robinson
Corvallis

Vote in favor of good neighbors

Dear Editor,

One thing I’ve noticed about recent letters to the editor is that those writing to support the incumbent County Commissioners and County Attorney were recommending maintaining a moderate position and experienced leaders, while those who want to unseat the incumbents often appear to be encouraging the fear of loss of private property rights and loss of freedom. When you use fear tactics it implies that you don’t have anything positive to offer. I have not seen evidence that the opponents of the incumbents have experience in local government or community organizing.

One recent writer said that ‘We need someone who is from Montana, five generations which seems adequate to me…’ Yet where is our freedom to move from one place to another if you have to be a fifth generation resident before your voice counts for anything? Why is it that if I was born here my opinions are of more value than if I moved here from elsewhere (a conscious choice rather than an accident of birth)?

Another writer described a fear of ‘grandchildren oppressed under the yoke of Socialist over-regulation….’ even though all of the incumbents can fairly be described as moderates. She went on to say that she listened carefully to all county commissioner nominees and felt that the incumbents had become ‘slick talkers’ but that she had made up her mind that she would vote for the opponents. Her mind was clearly already made up before she heard the ‘slick talkers.’

I especially appreciated, and would like to echo, the writer who spoke of people coming together as a community. ‘Why not see what common ground you share with your neighbor before you build a wall? ‘…Act respectfully, think neighborly.’ This was followed the next week by another writer saying that ‘Our society demands … that all of our actions be tempered with responsibility toward ourselves, our neighbors, and more and more toward the environment which we all share. … Increased freedom and liberty comes with increased responsibility for our actions.’ These are sentiments that give me hope that we can learn to live together and be good neighbors, instead of encouraging fearfulness, which does the opposite. I’ll be voting in favor of good neighbors.

Toddy Perryman
Corvallis

Support for Corn

Dear Editor,

Change is only good if what we get is better than what we had. Change is clearly not in our best interest in the Ravalli County Attorney’s race. For 18 years George Corn has done an impressive job of representing the citizens of Ravalli County by prosecuting the many sneaks, predators, lawbreakers and criminals who try to take advantage of us. At the same time he’s successfully managed a large office, a large budget, and an unwieldy caseload. He has given the County Commissioners unbiased legal advice in fighting frivolous lawsuits against the county. He has done so without the distracting personal malpractice lawsuits like those that have piled up against his opponent, Bill Fulbright. George has no need to hide his past the way Fulbright continues to do. These many lawsuits indicate that Fulbright couldn’t manage his own private practice. He certainly can’t be expected to manage a complex public office. The other attorneys in the CA’s office agree that he’s poorly qualified for the task. The best thing for Bill would be to remain an assistant under the watchful and benevolent eye of George Corn, where he might learn from the master. Perhaps one day he’ll be deserving of the post he now seeks. George Corn has the personal integrity, the work ethic, the vast experience, the track record, and the open-minded attitude that Fulbright can only wish for. Change in the County Attorney’s office now would not serve the responsible citizens of Ravalli County. George Corn must remain in office, for the good of us all.

Skip Horner
Victor

Experience and ability important

Dear Editor,

It was evident, at a recent overflow, noon meeting at the Frontier Café, that Ravalli county has four excellent individuals currently serving in elective offices. 

Bob Lake and Gary MacLaren are intelligent, articulate and dedicated members of the Montana legislature. Both are running to return to Helena to serve the citizens of the Bitterroot, Lake, as a senator, and MacLaren as a representative. They have demonstrated they have the experience and knowledge necessary to function effectively at the state level. It is essential, not only for our county but for Montana, that they return to work for all citizens.

Sitting commissioners Greg Chilcott and J.R. Iman presented informative and factual explanations regarding some of the complex issues of growth in the Bitterroot Valley. Their remarks were steeped in common sense, as well as in fact. It, too, was an excellent example of the thoughtfulness, intelligence and dedication these two gentlemen have brought to the Ravalli County Board of Commissioners. 

There is a need for additional qualified, like minded and dedicated individuals to enter the political arena, and serve in public office. We have a full slate to choose from on November 2nd, some more qualified than others. You are the judge, and may you make wise choices.

Dave Hurtt
Florence

Support for incumbents

Dear Editor,

The forum for county candidates Tuesday, October 5 at the middle school was a very successful and civil presentation for everyone. Thanks.

I came away wanting to support the balanced, moderate, common sense solutions offered by incumbents Hoffman, Corn, Rokosch, Driscoll, and Grandstaff. They are responsible, clear headed, and experienced. The incumbents often talked about the difficult multi-faceted problems of day-to-day governance. The challengers usually offered more general observations that could be summed up as less taxes and less government. If government were that simple we would have low taxes and little government.

I was struck in particular by how angry and messianic Matt Kanenwisher seemed. He glared at the audience as if he did not trust voters to see things exactly as he does. There are probably very few people in Montana who do not support lean responsible government and balanced budgets, but Kanenwisher could not give the governor and the state legislature any credit for Montana being only one of two states nationwide operating in the black. Instead he was critical of their efforts and often fell back on the simplistic formula of less taxes and less government. At what price?

The sky is not falling and the black helicopters are nowhere to be seen. If they come, we will face that as we have confronted danger before.

Dennis Pitman
Corvallis

Sabo is your best choice

Dear Editor,

Very few people have a building named after them. Nancy Sabo was honored with that distinction in 1999 when the "Nancy Sabo Justice Center" was established at the Ravalli County Courthouse. It was a tribute to her years of dedication and commitment not only to the justice system, but the people of Ravalli County.

Nancy Sabo served as Justice of the Peace for nearly 30 years. She was by far one of the most respected Justices of the Peace in the State. One of her many accomplishments was being selected by the Montana Supreme Court to author and update reference manuals that are being used by Judges statewide. She has vast knowledge of the laws which govern this State and the experience to dispense fair, impartial decisions on the Bench.

I have known Nancy Sabo for over 30 years and even worked for her for a time. As a supervisor, Nancy was always considerate, respectful, and supportive of her employees. As a Judge, she was fair, patient, conscientious, and professional to all those who entered her Courtroom. Please vote for Nancy Sabo for Justice of the Peace, Dept. 1.

Linda Chinn
Stevensville

What we need

Dear Editor,

While I agree with Mr. Scott on most of his opinion I think that the Tea Party and Libertarians are on the right track on wanting to throw out most incumbents from office. The only problem I have with his opinion is that voters cannot vote executives and CEO's out of their positions. We don't vote for business leaders--we vote for politicians. So, if we reshuffle the deck of politicians and ask for a new hand, those newly elected Congressmen and Senators will indeed get the message that indeed we are angry about where we have been and where we are headed financially. While I do not favor regulation of business per se there is no excuse for what happened in the 2009 financial meltdown. Some minimal oversight must happen over the financial markets and jobs must be brought back to America. For those who have taken marketing and business management courses in college over the last 40 years, we have been taught about the dangers of raising the minimum wage, the importance of the Global Economy to the United States and the benefits of NAFTA. Sorry folks, I did not buy it then and I don't buy it now. We are basically a Service Economy today, i.e. fast food, retail sales and a reseller of everything made overseas. What we need are American jobs, more American made products, a decent wage, and sound fiscal management without deficit spending. So I suggest we voters should demand nothing less than that from our elected officials both statewide and nationally. Surely the new guys will hear what voters are saying and will keep a watchful eye over their shoulders when their next election time comes up. Again, we vote for politicians, not business leaders.

John Ashton
Hamilton

Support for Fulbright

Dear Editor,

I decided to write this letter because I believe I have a unique perspective concerning the election of our next County Attorney which I would like to share with the citizens of Ravalli County. I have practiced law for over 25 years. I have been the prosecuting attorney for the Town of Darby for the past 14 years, and the prosecuting attorney for the Town of Stevensville for the past six years. Because of my prosecutorial duties, I have had the opportunity to work regularly with the Ravalli County Attorney's office on a number of criminal as well as civil cases, and I have worked with both of the current candidates - Bill Fulbright and George Corn. Both candidates are clearly qualified, both are good men, and both are my colleagues. But as in any election, a choice must be made. Because of my experience with the Ravalli County Attorney's office and with both of these men over the past 14 years, I will be casting my vote for Bill Fulbright as our next County Attorney. I encourage you to do likewise.

Jeff Hays
Hamilton

Vote out incumbents

Dear Editor,

The President and his radical policies have created unparalleled outrage and confusion, effectively taking everyone's mind from any other matters, especially small local elections. While we are tensely focusing on national affairs, we are neglecting the important ones in our own backyard, becoming dispirited and apathetic as we watch D.C. continue to erode our freedoms. I believe this is the main object of the President's controversial tactics. Healthcare, the stimulus, and cap and tax are only extra goodies thrown in as the real agenda unfolds. They make a fine red herring to distract us as the nation is usurped from the local level by his radical followers.

I have had dealings with the current Ravalli County commissioners. There is no doubt that they support the President's socialist-style governing. We need to vote them out of office and elect someone competent to take their place who will actually make informed decisions, and most importantly, listen to us.

I have met Suzy Foss, the Republican candidate for commissioner personally.

Several things that impressed me the most about her were her willingness to associate with and listen to common folks, as well as her humble attitude and willingness to be corrected. These virtues stood in stark contrast to the arrogance and upper-ruling-class attitude of the current commissioners. I have friends who know the other Republican candidates. They are all good, capable people.

And yes, your vote does matter! Someone else cannot do it for you. I urge you.

Please, take the time for your county, your freedom, and your children's future on election day. Stand with me to vote the President's enablers out of office. Elect Suzy Foss, Ron Stoltz, and Matt Kanenwisher as our county commissioners, and Bill Fulbright as our county attorney.

Margaret A. Mullaly
Florence

Give Fulbright a try

Dear Editor,

George Corn, our current County Attorney, has done an excellent job of prosecuting child molesters. Most, if not all, that have met him in the courtroom are now behind bars where they belong.

About nine years ago three women were brutally murdered at the hair salon in Florence, Montana.

Incompetent (to put it mildly) law enforcement floundered around wasting taxpayer’s money to come up with nothing. No motive was discovered and very little evidence. Finally the truth bubbled to the surface. A DNA database on the West Coast had a hit and a match. The culprit was incarcerated already out there on unrelated charges. This man was questioned and told he faced our gurney at Deer Lodge with lethal injection for payment.

He sang like a sparrow to admit he was hired to collect drug money from one of the women or kill her. He implicated the man who hired him to save his own neck.

The man (drug lord) who hired him plea bargained on an unrelated charge so he’ll be out on the street again. The man who did the killing has never been charged with first degree, premeditated murder in Ravalli County.

Where’s our County Attorney when he is needed? Is this another O.J. Simpson/Johnny Cochran fiasco?

I happen to be an old baseball coach. When my star batter strikes out I send someone else up to the plate; I’m asking you, the voters of Ravalli County, to do the same. Send Bill Fulbright up there and give him the chance he deserves. Next batter up!

Dennis Schutz
Stevensville

Meth, not even once

Dear Editor,

We’ve all seen the billboards, an attempt to turn youth from destruction and rightly so. There is hope but we must look at the source of the problem. Drugs, greed abortion, homosexuality, divorce, murder, etc. are all part of the damage inflicted by the disease. God calls the disease sin. We are sinking in our own filth. America is in the midst of a spiritual battle the size of which we cannot grasp, nor do most of us want to. We would rather play ball or watch TV, spew, flaunt and promote sin, than to face reality. We expect humanist and political solutions to “fix” the problem. We would rather blame something or someone else than admit our own guilt. This is rebellion against God. God is denied, and Christ is rejected! Yet we say “God Bless America.” Blaspheme your earthly father and see how he likes it. We must return to God. Exodus Ch: 20, The First Commandment, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”

The Apostle Paul warns us in Romans, Ch. 1, that the culmination of rebellion against God is a culture that has turned to homosexuality, inward corruption to the point of collapse. Read it. Also read Isa 1:2:

“Hear, O Heavens and give ear, O earth: for the Lord has spoken, I have nourished and brought up children and they have rebelled against me.”

God loves you, but He hates sin. That is why He sent His son Jesus! What will you do with Jesus? Jn 14:6 & Revelations 3:20.

Dan Leonardi
Hamilton

Whose property rights?

Dear Editor,

There has been a lot of talk about property rights lately and I don’t think that they are talking about mine. One landowner should not be allowed to de-value or cause negative impacts to his neighbor’s property. Proper planning is imperative to this end.  

A large development of one-acre parcels went in near my rural home in Corvallis. After dozens of new wells went in, many existing wells in the area went dry or began to sputter. New wells and visits from the pump guys cost money. The developer did not cover these costs. Where were my property rights?

Several years ago, a different neighbor decided that he would like to put in a professional motocross training track. Although my home is over 500 yards away, it was nearly impossible to have a conversation outside while the track was in use. Just imagine the noise inside the homes that were much closer. Not only does that noise level detract from the enjoyment of our homes, but of course it de-values them. Fortunately, the neighborhood was able to come up with over $30,000 for lawyer’s fees to stop this infringement of my property right to the quiet enjoyment of my property.

On Cooper Lane, a nice neighborhood near Hamilton, an old house was torn down and a large mini-storage was erected in the middle of a residential neighborhood! Commercial use in residential areas is incompatible. Imagine having people come to get into their storage unit at 2 a.m. with motion lights going on, headlights flashing about and car doors slamming. This has a negative effect on the value of adjacent homes. That developer’s property rights trumped those rights of others so that he could maximize his profits.

These are just a few of the many fine examples in Ravalli County where one person’s property rights trump the property rights of others and the community.  

In the coming election, please vote for County Commission candidates that support some necessary planning, namely Driscoll, Rokosch, and Grandstaff. Of all of the candidates, these are the ones who truly wish to protect our property rights, not just the rights of the would-be developer.

Andy Roubik
Corvallis

Support for incumbents

Dear Editor,

In a recent edition of the Bitterroot Star, David Merrick passionately argues in support of four Libertarian candidates over their Republican challengers. This is the same person who is listed as the contact on billboards and several half-page ads in the local papers that urge voting out the incumbents for County Commissioner and County Attorney (by voting in favor of Republican candidates for those positions). Perhaps these Republican challengers, with agendas extreme enough to have attracted Merrick’s support, would fit better in the Libertarian party?

Now, despite being offered multiple dates to choose from throughout the month of October, at least three of these four Republican challengers have declined to attend a non-partisan Meet-the-Candidates Forum for the Florence/Lone Rock area. Why would they (including Ron Stoltz, the challenger for the Commissioner position that represents this area) pass on this lone opportunity to appear in person with their opponents in the north end of the Valley? Is there something they don’t want you to know?

We are fortunate to have a group of five commissioners (2 Republicans, 2 Democrats, and 1 Independent) who work together for the best interests of us, the citizens. We’ll all be better off if we keep that well functioning group together by returning the incumbent candidates to office. That means voting “yes” for Kathleen Driscoll, Carlotta Grandstaff, Jim Rokosch and George Corn!

Come meet the candidates for County Attorney and County Commissioners on Oct. 27th at 6:30 at the Florence School Library.

David Parsons
Florence

Support for Sabo

Dear Editor,

When people ask me who I support for the position of Justice of the Peace in Ravalli County, I never hesitate with the answer, because Nancy Sabo is the only answer!

I have known Nancy for over 40 years and can state unequivocally that she possesses all of the necessary attributes of an outstanding Justice of the Peace, a position she held with distinction for many years. She has that rare quality of common sense and compassion, and perhaps most importantly, she is fair and impartial in her dealings with the public. 

If you want a no nonsense, principled advocate of the "people's court", and a Justice Court Judge with a proven track record, the choice is painfully obvious - elect Nancy Sabo! The citizens of Ravalli County deserve the best!

Jay Printz, Retired Ravalli County Sheriff
Hamilton

Support for Moran

Dear Editor,

We have reached the time in all political campaigns when candidates are stressing their strongest arguments to win the vote. Unfortunately, some candidates believe that their strongest argument is an attack on the opposition. Asking for a vote against an opponent’s platform is far easier than formulating an original position. The negative atmosphere created by such tactics contributes to the apathy and cynicism of many Americans.

This November there are many who seek to lead us. But true leaders have positive ideas. Terry Moran is a collaborator, one who will work with others who share her innovation, work ethic, and well-considered decisions. For those reasons we believe Terry Moran will best represent the Bitterroot Valley in the Montana Legislature and are proud to offer her our support.

Jeanette McKee & Jean Steele
Hamilton

Support for Erickson

Dear Editor,

Going “on the doors” with Senate District 44 candidate, Pam Erickson, has provided unique insight into the voters of Ravalli County, and I would like to thank the following for their graciousness:

The school teachers who not only listened to my oratory but thanked me for my volunteering efforts; the little boy with the mouthful of peanut butter who was simply delighted to visit with me (that goes both ways, Kiddo); the woman who came to the door sideways, not completely dressed, with whom I joked about appropriate attire for voting; the woman with the VW Golf who loves her car as much as I loved mine; the devout Christian who beat up any of her classmates whose parents did not support FDR; the young man anticipating his second deployment to Iraq; the woman who explained the difference between an Oklahoman and a Sooner; the many gentlemen whose bearing demanded that I not stand at the door but be seated in the comfort of their homes; and all the dogs and cats I initially upset but eventually befriended.

You folks understand the real gist of this campaign; it is not about the individual candidates running for office, but is rather all about YOU. Only those candidates who have you in mind—your families, your jobs, your futures—those whose first order of business is to serve you, will best represent you.

And that is why I have been campaigning with Pam Erickson. She is a candidate who meets and exceeds the above criteria and will work hard for her constituents. She knows this election is about you, and her commonsense approach and ability to work with people of all political stripes will best serve you in Helena. Please join me on November 2 in voting for Pam Erickson for Senate District 44.

Mary Barton
Hamilton

Not who you want to run the county

Dear Editor,

Ron Stoltz went bankrupt to the tune of $500,000 in 2002, and is running for a well-paid government position on an anti-government ticket along with Foss, Fulbright, Kanenwisher and Kelly. Ron’s bankruptcy has received no press as of this writing and Ron has been a no-show at public forums where people were present wishing to ask him about it. All we know about Ron is that he wants to run our government like his business. Add this alarming revelation to Fulbright's well-publicized bankruptcy and you have almost a million dollars this crew has stiffed people and now they claim they can fix our economic problems with their economic prowess? What’s up with that?

Mrs. Foss (local realtor Lee Foss' wife) spouts irrelevant nonsense about coercing the federal government to do the county's bidding through what she calls "coordination", an idea straight out of the Posse Comitatus, “County Supremacy” playbook (remember them: the ultra-violent, anti-Semitic militia hate group preying on bankrupt mid-west farmers in the 80s leading up to Oklahoma City?). Mrs. Foss, who doesn’t like being associated with anti-Semitism, takes credit for a group (Celebrating Conservatism) who brings in people like Red Beckman, who says out loud that since the Jews killed Jesus they deserved the Holocaust. What’s up with that?

Wayne Kelly says he will save us money by signing up a volunteer posse(!) to handle law-enforcement matters. This would include the granting of “Sheriff” Kelly’s personal permission to any federal or “federalized” employee before approaching another Ravalli County citizen. According to Kelly and Celebrating Conservatism, whom Foss, Kanenwisher, Fulbright, Stoltz and Kelly all have willingly associated themselves with, a “federalized” employee would include all folks working at the lab, in our schools, for the Forest Service or anyone else working under any federal law. Remember: a posse, appointed by “Sheriff” Kelly, jackbooting the majority of our taxpaying citizens in the name of “County Supremacy.” And Kelly (and Foss and Stoltz and Kanenwisher and Fulbright) claim this kind of behavior is going to save us money?

That’s what this crew has to offer Ravalli County. They protest much at being associated with the terms like “anti-Semitic” and “jackboots,” but an informed voter needs to ask themselves where and when these candidates have distanced themselves from the likes of Celebrating Conservatism and Red Beckman. There is no “where” and “when.” They haven’t, and apparently don’t want to distance themselves from this basest form of extremism.

Informed and concerned voters, please ask yourselves: What's up with that?

Bill LaCroix
Victor

Shame on the NRA!

Dear Editor,

Shame on the NRA for acting like elitist federal government bureaucrats!

Do you wonder why the NRA is involved in Montana’s Ballot Initiative 161? After all, it has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment and 161 is a State issue, right? So why are they sticking their out of state noses in our business? I will tell you what I believe. 

Some higher up, NRA administrative rich types buy these guaranteed outfitter tags. They feel they are too good and too important to win them in the lottery drawings like the other folk who live out-of-state, like your family and friends most likely have to do. And what a waste in potential state revenue we lose because the excess outfitter tags are not sold. Guess who pays for that loss? Yep, we the common folk do.

I am an NRA Endowment Member who is deeply offended the NRA is choosing to act like the federal government by forcing their power and influence on a Montana Ballot Initiative. Who the heck do they think they are, federal politicians? I guarantee they will never get one more cent from me and hopefully not from you either. Vote yes on 161 and tell the elitists and NRA to mind their own business and to shove it.

Vincent G. Vaccaro, Sr
Townsend

Support for Corn

Dear Editor,

I am a conservative supporting the re-election of George Corn as Ravalli County Attorney. Many vocal supporters of local candidates would have you believe that party affiliation is the primary criteria to serve as a county official. I prefer to base my voting decisions on demonstrated ability to get the job done.

As our County Attorney for twenty years, George Corn has respected and protected individual rights and provided requested legal opinions based on Montana law. Under his leadership the County Attorney’s office has prosecuted all types of criminal offenders, including predators.  

George Corn has followed the law as adopted by the Montana legislature. Part of the County Attorney job is to provide legal opinions when asked, based on the law not popular opinion. Just because a vocal group disagrees with a legal opinion based on Montana law does not make it wrong or a “political opinion.”

I have over thirty years of management experience, much of which has been in large professional organizations. Having been one of the few Ravalli County residents who has attended three of George Corn’s annual budget presentations to the County Commissioners over the years I recognize an effective management approach.     

Personnel costs are a major part of the County Attorney’s budget and it has consistently been managed by George Corn to get maximum value for Ravalli County. His opponent in the race has not cited or demonstrated similar experience and results.

As our County Attorney, George Corn has consistently demonstrated character, integrity and competence as both a manager and a prosecutor. The professional record and conduct as a candidate of his opponent does not come close in any of these categories.

I urge voters to re-elect George Corn as our County Attorney.

Rick Fuhrman
Hamilton

Support for Swandal

Dear Editor,

Candidate for Montana Supreme Court Judge, Nels Swandal, has just been endorsed by the NRA, Montana Shooting Sports Organization, and Montana Family Action. That is in addition to Stockgrowers, Montana Farm Bureau and Montana Realtors Assoc., in addition to others. His opponent was endorsed, this week, by NARL. She has also been endorsed by the AFL-CIO and MT Conservation Voters, a very liberal triage. Judge Swandal is currently a trial judge, and brings a unique and important perspective to the Supreme Court. He has been a District Court Judge for the past 15 years. With that experience he will add stability and balance to the Supreme Court. On Nov. 2nd vote Nels Swandal.

Betty Swift
Hamilton

Support for Corn

Dear Editor,

I'm writing to recommend George Corn as the best candidate for Ravalli County Attorney.

George is well respected throughout the state by judges, lawyers, legislators and others who have contact with the courts. As a result, the citizens of Ravalli County have a highly credible voice in important matters such as DUI and victim rights affecting our state.

The County Attorney is one of the most visible and important positions in our legal system. You want and deserve a person in that office who has the highest professional and ethical standards. George Corn is that kind of attorney and person. I urge Ravalli County voters to re-elect him.

Fred Van Valkenburg
Missoula County Attorney

Vote out liberals

Dear Editor,

They are at it again! The reintroduction of the Growth Policy was made evident at last Friday's latest Conservative Pachyderm meeting in Stevensville, 10/15/10, when two of the present County Commissioners, Greg Chilcott and J.R. Iman (neither up for re-election in 2010), gave lengthy presentations for their irrational thinking, why this county needs another Growth Policy. Excuse me! But this proposal was soundly defeated in 2008 by the voting public, and no proposed change of wording will alter the fact that if this new policy were allowed to become law in Ravalli County, it would be detrimental to the ranchers, many homeowners and business communities. How? you ask. Simply by reinforcing the continued negative influences of the liberal forces in control of the current political processes in the Bitterroot Valley! Why, indeed, would you want to keep in power a few people that want to install and control their own adverse political agendas?

Therefore, it becomes imperative on November 2nd to replace the three incumbent Commissioners and the current County Attorney with the following four new names, bringing common sense and proper County leadership to protect the property rights and the voting will of the citizens. For County Commissioners: Ron Stoltz, Suzy Foss, Matt Kanenwisher and for County District Attorney: Bill Fulbright.

Remember, this is an extremely important "off year" election and everyone should express their conscientious political convictions by absentee ballot or at their assigned polling districts. Voting in America is a Constitutional privilege and you are strongly encouraged to exercise this wonderful gift before it is lost by uncaring public apathy along with blind allegiance to those that are now in control! Please get out and vote for conservative values that helped make this country great, and will continue to do so in the future!

Thomas Chidwick
Stevensville

Principle before party

Dear Editor,

One thing we need to all remember is that we are Americans first. Party politics with its labels are secondary and can easily lead us astray. First we must understand correct principles and always use the Constitution as our guide to judge any candidate's actions and promises seeking election, or an incumbent's voting record seeking to be re-elected, to gauge the likelihood they will uphold their oath of office to support that supreme law of the land. The Constitution is neither “liberal” nor “conservative,” Democrat nor Republican. It is a simple enumeration of the powers to be delegated to the Federal government (and clarification of a few powers the states cannot exercise), because the only powers the Federal Government may exercise are those explicitly granted by the Constitution. The document is the very embodiment of limited government.  

Ronald Reagan once said, “The very heart and soul of Conservatism is Libertarianism.” Libertarianism most closely follows the Constitution on limited government. Good Republicans, Democrats and Independents want to be Libertarians in that aspect but they are coerced or intimidated by their own party into toeing the party line which is controlled by top party insiders. I hear people say, “Why do politicians continue to make the same mistakes, don’t they ever learn?” The answer is: Yes, they do learn! They learn that they can get away with it. They learn that people have short memories. That is what they learn. To break this cycle we must learn to vote as Americans for the best candidate regardless of Party affiliation.

If someone has breached their oath in the past, don’t be swayed any longer by the argument that you must vote for them just because they have experience. Any one of average intelligence can learn to do a good job representing us and will not owe favors to anyone.  

I would like to quote the wise words of Hyrum Smith, spoken in 1844, which are just as relevant today. “We engage in the election the same as in any other principle: You are to vote for good men, and if you do not do this, it is a sin; to vote for wicked men it would be a sin. Choose the good and refuse the evil. Men of false principles have preyed upon us like wolves on helpless lambs. Damn the rod of tyranny; curse it. Let every man use his liberties according to the Constitution. Don’t fear man or Devil; electioneer with all people, male and female, and exhort them to do the thing that is right. We want a president of the U.S., not a party president, but a president of the whole people; for a party president disfranchises the opposite party. Have a president who will maintain every man in his rights.”

A happy condition that we all want starts with an aware electorate. We have been trapped in the left-right paradigm which have both been marching us away from limited government. The establishment uses Democrats to make the advances towards Socialism and the Republicans to consolidate on their gains.  

We have some outstanding principled men that decided their best option was to run on the Libertarian ticket in Ravalli County. If you value what our founding Fathers gave us, namely a Constitutional Republic, freedom, liberty, prosperity, formula for happiness, you will consider them. They would begin the process of reining in tyrannical government, bringing us back to the Constitutional moorings envisioned by our founding fathers.

God raised up our wise founding fathers to write the Constitution for the benefit of all mankind, and holds men accountable for their acts in relation to it, both in making laws and in administering them. With the freedom and right of choice which God has given us, and the Constitution secures for us, comes the responsibility of choice. Quoting Thomas S. Monson: “We cannot be neutral; there is no middle ground . . . decisions are constantly before us . . . to make them wisely courage is needed -- the courage to say no, the courage to say yes, decisions do determine destiny. All of our choices have consequences.”  

With that said, I would hope that we all vote for candidates who have proven themselves faithful in the past by making a stand on these great principles of agency and freedom rather than candidates of the sort that have gotten us into our current sorry condition.

Art Baker
Stevensville

Support for Lake

Dear Editor,

I am a life member of the NRA and I just received my magazine, and in it were the endorsements for the candidates. I couldn't help but notice that Pam Erickson received a D. Now I know what this means but I want to explain to those who don't. "An anti-gun candidate who usually supports restrictive gun control legislation and opposes pro-gun reforms. Regardless of public statements, can usually be counted on to vote wrong on key issues." My gun rights are very important to me so I will be voting for Bob Lake as he received the endorsement for District 44.

Dean Walrod
Hamilton

Support for Fulbright

Dear Editor,

I am writing to express my support for Bill Fulbright for Ravalli County Attorney. As an attorney, I have had the privilege of knowing and working with Bill Fulbright. In addition to his work as a prosecutor, Bill has taken the time to share his knowledge and passion for seeking justice for victims, particularly child victims, with prosecutors and other professionals from across the United States to assist them in improving their ability to serve their communities.

Having personally attended courses that he has taught, it is obvious that Bill’s commitment stems not merely from a sense of duty to his job, but from a heartfelt compassion for the most vulnerable members of society. The willingness to tackle these complex and personally difficult cases says a lot about a prosecutor. No one who has heard Bill talk about working with victims with developmental delays or conducting a thorough investigation to ensure a just outcome can question his dedication.

The office of county attorney has an incredible impact on the lives of citizens as the county attorney must set priorities in protecting the public, work effectively with professionals from various agencies and disciplines, and establish standards of service to those who are victims of crime. Bill’s qualifications and qualities will serve the citizens of Ravalli County well as he works to ensure justice, promote community, and protect its citizens.

Rachel Mitchell

Support for I-164

Dear Editor,

During this 2010 election cycle, much of the focus has been on candidates. Voters are overwhelmed with ads, letters to the editor, and persuasive calls supporting or opposing candidates. While this is the nature of politics, it is of extreme importance when going to the polls to assess the weight of the issues and be informed on the ballot initiatives. One initiative in particular will offer tangible economic justice to working class and everyday Montanans.

I-164, the “Cap the Rate” ballot initiative, aims to place a limit on the amount car title and payday lenders can charge on short-term loans. Currently these predatory lending companies charge an average of 400% interest, and legally up to 650% interest APR. Several advocacy groups, as part of the Cap the Rate coalition, recognize that these rates are too high, and must be capped at 36% to protect consumers (military families are already protected by a 36% cap on payday and title loans).

In the spring of 2010, over 1000 Bitterrooters acknowledged that these practices target and hurt our friends and neighbors and signed the I-164 petition. Many of the folks who signed the petition have friends, family and co-workers who have been negatively impacted by taking out these loans and finding themselves in a debt trap. As a signature gatherer, many stories come to mind of people getting drawn into the debt cycle. The story is predictably the same - it starts out with that first loan, not being able to come up with the additional fees, and taking out another loan to pay off the first. The model is designed this way. It is geared to get borrowers to take that initial loan and make them a repeat customer, with the average borrower taking up to 13 loans a year. Think of how quickly things can get out of control when you consider repaying $800 on a $300 loan. The business model has been an extremely successful one - Montanans pay over $9 million a year on fees and interest on payday and title loans, to mostly out of state companies (over 70%). What’s even more troubling is considering that over 65% of all borrowers have children, this means that families are getting caught in the debt trap.

There is a fair amount of frustration and righteous indignation over national and local economics. People are struggling, and anyone could be in need of an emergency loan. I-164 will allow Montanans to speak loudly and justly on an unacceptable and unethical business practice that drains money out of our state economy - and will put a stop to the predatory lending debt trap happening every day in our communities. As we move closer to November 2, voters are being targeted with slick ad campaigns by opponents of I-164, with funds being dumped in by out of state corporations making big money off of borrowers in the state of Montana. No doubt a last ditch effort to try and salvage the gravy train predatory lenders have been riding for some time. Protect Montana families and support I-164.

Kate Duggan, Bitterroot Coordinator
Montana Women Vote

The Greatest Generation, our generation(s)

Dear Editor,

I never thought I’d be glad that my parents and grandparents were dead. You see, they were part of the greatest generation. They fought in at least one World War. They survived the Great Depression. Everybody pulled together and worked and sacrificed so that we – all of us – could have a better life. Now, it seems, we’re ready to give it all back.

In the early 1900’s American life was very different. Most people dropped out of school to help support their families. College was only for the rich and privileged. There wasn’t any minimum wage, let alone a livable wage. Health care, pension, retirement – Ha! Who needed it? The life expectancy for men was 47 and women 50. Most people died on the job. The Greatest Generation said, “We can do better!”

During WWII, everyone was affected. Gas and food rationing, retooling factories and women doing the work that men usually did because most men were in the military – either volunteered or drafted. I guess when we hire a couple hundred thousand “volunteers” to fight and protect us while the rest of us 250+ million go on our merry way, unaffected, well…

Did you know that during WWII, the tax rate on the richest people reached 90% to help finance the war effort? Right now the wealthiest 2% of us and their allies are raising hell about returning – yes returning – to the tax rate, around 39%, prior to the Bush tax cuts. They got the tax cut because we had such a sizeable surplus in the Treasury. They say they need the tax cut to “stimulate” the economy. It’s called trickle down economics (which historically has never worked). During the Bush Admin, while they had the tax cut, what happened? Adjusted for inflation, the income of most Americans remained flat or even decreased while the income of the wealthiest, the richest 2% of Americans, increased on average 300%. And fewer American jobs were created in those eight years than during the last two years during this recession. The politicians tell us that letting this tax rate for the wealthiest 2% will adversely affect small businesses, and that small businesses drive employment and the economy. They’re right! Except that 97% of small businesses won’t be affected if the tax rate goes up on the wealthiest.

Times are tough right now, there’s no denying that. But nothing compared to the Great Depression. There are basically three engines that drive the economy – consumer spending, business spending and government spending. (BTW-businesses are currently hoarding over $1 trillion and not hiring workers). Right now consumers and businesses aren’t spending, so it’s up to government. It’s called stimulus. FDR did it to help end the Great Depression too. Back then, the deficit climbed to over 100% of GDP. The smart people knew it was only temporary and would come back down as the economy revived. But then, like now, the “deficit hawks” went crazy and forced FDR to cut back on spending – too soon. The result was that the Depression was extended a few years, unnecessarily.

In the 90’s both Sweden and Japan experienced serious recessions, like we are now. Sweden took drastic steps, including nationalizing the banks and major stimulus through deficit spending. They were out of trouble in just a few years and the banks were returned to the private sector and their economy is strong. Japan listened to the deficit hawks, cut back on stimulus programs, left the private sector alone – they’re still in a recession.

FDR’s administration put together a Commission, the Pecora Commission, to find out what caused the Great Depression and to make recommendations to avoid a repeat. Out of this commission came the Glass-Stegall Act (1933) which kept any single business from acting as a combination of commercial bank, investment bank and insurance company. The Glass-Steagall Act protected American assets in banks from the far greater risks taken by investment banks and some insurance/investment companies. Americans came to trust commercial banks because commercial banks were closely regulated and their funds were protected by the FDIC.

In 1999 John Boehner (Rep. Ohio) was head of the Republican Conference and led the effort for Republican Phil Gramm to pass the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the formal name of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999) which repealed a portion of the Glass-Steagall Act.

Boehner helped Phil Gramm again and Gramm got the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 passed. That act effectively deregulated credit default swaps.

With the combination of the “modernization acts,” the refusal of the Bush Administration to impose any sort of supervision on financial market practices, and Greenspan’s belief that banks would regulate their own greed, it only took the U.S. financial markets eight years to melt down after Boehner helped lead the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.

If Republicans take over the House in 2010, Boehner will likely be Speaker. He will set the agenda.

Fifty years ago Goldman Sachs held assets of around $10 million which belonged to the partners – private capital. Currently GS holds $74 billion in public funds – other people’s money – some of it is yours and mine through pension fund investments and other instruments. And thanks to Gramm, Boehner and friends, there’s no regulation as to how they can gamble with it. Wall Street and Big Banking were bailed out partly because the losses would more adversely affect you and me – not them!

When Obama was elected in ’08, he asked for bipartisan solutions to our problems. The Republicans played him like a cheap guitar. On Health Care, in committee, the R’s kept saying, my constituents won’t quite go for that but ease it back to this and we’re OK. Over and over and over again until they got a very watered down bill that was barely a step in the right direction. Then when it came onto the floor for a vote, they said NO.

They did the same on financial reform. Now they’re campaigning on “let’s fix health care and financial reform – do it the right way.” They had a chance and they’re the ones who made it as weak as it is. Do you really think they’ll “fix it right”?

As for the Democrats – fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. So the R’s look smart and the D’s look dumb. And what did “we the people” get out of this? Did we start to solve our problems? It’s all just political games. The overarching attitude seems to be: when the other side lies and cheats and steals, they’re dirty, rotten bastards. When our side lies and cheats and steals, we’re “clever.” But, in this scenario, we all lose.

Does it frustrate me? Hell yes. Does it make me angry? You betcha. Do I want to vent my anger and yell at those politicians and “throw the bums out?” Oh yeah! Other than making me feel good for about five minutes, does it do any good? No.

Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman, writing about our current political situation: “We are no longer the nation that used to amaze the world with its visionary projects. We have become, instead, a nation whose politicians seem to compete over who can show the least vision, the least concern about the future and the greatest willingness to pander to short-term, narrow-minded selfishness.

“By refusing to pay for essential investment, politicians are both perpetuating unemployment and sacrificing long-run growth. And why not? After all, this seems to be a winning electoral strategy. All vision of a better future seems to have been lost, replaced with a refusal to look beyond the narrowest, most shortsighted notion of self-interest.”

And Professor of biogeography and Pulitzer Prize winning author Jared Diamond writing in “Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed” - about failed societies: “Key decisions…were made by the chiefs, who were motivated to increase their own prestige, even in cases where that might conflict with the good of the current society as a whole and of the next generation.”

Don’t believe me? That’s fine. Do your own research. And that doesn’t mean listening to the same TV personalities telling you what you want to believe. Look for the facts. Ferret out the truth. Read your history and read long form articles by non-partisan scholars. There’s more to the issues than headlines and 20 second soundbites. And fact check those emails swirling around the internet. There are several websites devoted to exposing the myths and spreading the truth. Slow connection at home? Take your laptop to the library – they have high speed wi-fi (and books and magazines too!). Or use the computers at the library. There are people there who can help you too. Or take a teenager with you to navigate to the info you’re looking for.

If you think I’m some fringe lefty liberal, I’m not. I’m just a guy looking for the facts and information to help me make sense out of the mess we’re in, and looking for direction to get out of it. I’m proud to be an Independent; I’m not beholden to some party platform or politician. I can vote for my principles (although it’s hard to find a politician who has any). And I’m a moderate and a progressive: moderate because I think our world is a complicated place and rarely is anything black or white anymore. And progressive because I think we should look to facts and learn from history so that we don’t keep repeating the same mistakes.

When you vote this November, you might want to think about what the Greatest Generation did for us and what we’re about to do for the next generation(s).

Mark Van Loon
Hamilton

Republicans for Carlotta

Dear Editor,

I write in response to criticism from the Republican Central Committee (RCC) for our group’s newspaper ad supporting the re-election of Independent Commissioner, Carlotta Grandstaff, and our selective support for Republican, multi-issue (State/Federal) candidates. With respect to the RCC assertion that we are suspect Republicans, we submit that a belief in absolute, personal, real-property rights is not a litmus test to be a Republican. If that be the case, there would scarcely be any Republicans, as most live (presumably somewhat tranquilly) in areas that employ a modicum of planning tools, i.e. zoning/subdivision/building codes. Moreover, I don’t ever recall having a political discussion (and there have been hundreds) with fellow Republicans (outside the Valley) where this issue ever surfaced as an element of Conservative thought or values.

Given the focus on this issue by the RCC, we wonder why it limits its concerns to land resources to the exclusion of other natural resources such as water and air. Surely, the same constitutional principles that they claim protect our rights to exploit our land resources without interference by the government would also apply to the right to unfettered exploitation of all natural resources attached to our land. It is curious to note that the RCC (and its three Commissioner candidates) only invoke constitutional protection for those rights which pertain to the erection of structures on land, e.g. zoning or streamside setbacks. It’s almost as if, in their view, our Constitution was written solely to protect the rights of Developers.

“We just want to be free. Free to lead our lives as we please, so long as we do not infringe on the same freedom of others.” (Source: Give us Liberty; A Tea Party Manifesto). Fortunately, the Constitution isn’t diminished to refereeing between the competing claims of citizens who disagree over their relative rights to live freely. Competing claims by neighbors disputing “infringements on their freedoms” must be settled by local, elected officials governed by the Constitution to ensure due process and the rule of law (for example, the economic benefit of a motocross track to a landowner vs. the freedom from excessive noise to an adjacent neighbor).

With respect to the re-election of Commissioner Grandstaff, the current iteration of the Ravalli County Commission is a hybrid configuration of five elected managers who are charged with the coherent management of the daily operations of the County. Surprisingly (and fortunately for us and county staff), the current Commission has functioned fairly effectively and harmoniously. We think this harmony is due to two reasons (in addition to a little serendipity).

As the internal voting patterns among the Commissioners reveal, the issues are almost never decided on a partisan basis.

While we do not agree with Commissioner Grandstaff on everything, we believe that she is the catalyst that molds together the constantly varying coalitions within the Commission to avoid dissension and govern in a unified manner. Grandstaff is respected by her fellow Commissioners (and staff) as an absolute whiz with the nearly impenetrable intricacies of county governance and for her devotion to doing the best thing for the County irrespective of any partisan concerns. This combined with her penchant for listening and evaluating rather than posturing, makes her an ideal team player… a team leader.

The candidacy of Mrs. Foss (and her startling statements) presents a dramatic contrast to that of Commissioner Grandstaff. Her (Foss’) sparse resume, emphasis on a single, local issue (absolute personal property rights (Source: electsuzyfoss.com), and her interest in reforming the Forest Service (“I haven’t had time to attend the Commission meetings as I have been an army of one fighting the Forest Service.” Source: Speech at Pachyderm meeting; August 13) makes us wonder if she has the interests, temperament, and experience to attend effectively to the daily grind that is the job of our Commissioners. This, and other pronouncements (“My major qualification for the job of Commissioner is that I’m a pissed off grandma.” Source: Pachyderm meeting; August 13) compel us to urge Republicans and Independents who are itching to send a message with a single ticket vote, to make an exception. Vote to re-elect Commissioner Grandstaff.

Chuck DeWitt
Republicans for Responsible Candidates

Support for incumbents

Dear Editor,

I like watching a wobbly newborn calf get up to nurse on a cold February morning. I like watching a 5-point buck rub at his velvet antlers from the seat of my swather. I am immensely proud to be farming the same land as my dad, granddad, and great granddad. That’s why I endorse Carlotta Grandstaff, Jim Rokosch, and Kathleen Driscoll for Ravalli County Commissioner.

The other candidates talk about property rights endlessly. What they really mean is property rights for real estate developers and no one else. When subdivisions move next to my family’s ranch, our property rights are negatively affected. They want free rein to steal my irrigation water, sell off lots around my ranch as if it is their personal golf course, and increase my taxes to pay for roads, schools, and all the additional services more people need. 

I want to see a thriving economy in this valley. Agriculture is part of that picture. Our ranch will contribute money to the local economy forever.

We need some reasonable people in the county commissioners’ office. This valley and your grandchildren need you to vote for Grandstaff, Rokosch, and Driscoll.

Andy Maki
Corvallis

Vote for the best candidates regardless of party

Dear Editor,

Last Thursday’s Ravalli Republic carried a news item about the Bitterroot Citizens for Responsible Government (BCRG), a new political action organization committed to providing a truly bi-partisan forum to evaluate and endorse experienced and responsible candidates of any party to seek County offices.

The news item also carried an immediately negative response from Mr. Terry Nelson, Ravalli County GOP Chairman. Among his criticisms was that of one of the six announcing panelists, Kathie Roubik, my wife, who stated that she is a Reagan Conservative. (And we are both life-long Republicans.) Evidently skeptical of that, perhaps unwilling to learn that some Republicans are among the founders of this group, Mr. Nelson seemed to imply that our absence from “any of our Republican functions” might disqualify us as legitimate Republicans. Fact is, after attending two of those functions, as well as twice to Celebrating Conservatism meetings, we were even more convinced than initially that we wanted no part of the Republican Party in this county.

The Republican Party here is unlike any we have experienced in other parts of the country: negative toward any sort of planning, disruptive in public meetings, vituperative toward those of differing viewpoints, unwilling to offer constructive thought toward any county problems and quick to condemn those who do so, and naysaying any and all planning ideas not guaranteeing total, absolute and unyielding individual property rights as they see them. Why would we want to be among such folks! And I think our revulsion is shared by many here who are Republicans in principle. Better, we should immerse ourselves in politically active, mostly-Democratic efforts working toward effective planning to accommodate soon-to-resume growth in a manageable way, so we can retain the best aspects of the quality of life afforded by our marvelous Valley. And we invite all like-minded citizens, Democrat, Independent and Republican, to visit with us and evaluate their comfort level.

Regarding Mr. Nelson’s slate of county candidates, I’ve listened to them, read their websites, visited in person with some, and read newspaper reports and LTEs. His contention that they have “tremendous lifetime experience that well suit them for the jobs they are running for” is curious at best. Their experience seems to be for County Attorney inability to handle a private law practice without incurring malfeasance suits and consequent judgments, for County Sheriff to have experience only as highway truck maintenance supervisor, and for County Commissioners the inability to successfully run a business and then stiffing the taxpayer with the unpaid property tax, nursing experience and clerical work in a title company, and fear of an imagined United Nations’ plan to take over our Valley. Add in their propensity toward Libertarianism and the picture darkens even more. And they never mention any experience in elective office, participation on school boards or in community programs. No thank you. And again no thank you.

All of the present county incumbents are now well experienced and productive in their jobs, cooperative with each other, politically balanced, community oriented, very open to citizen input, and committed to the public good. This is why BCRG strongly urges voters to retain County Commissioners Jim Rokosch, Kathleen Driscoll and Carlotta Grandstaff, as well as County Attorney George Corn and County Sheriff Chris Hoffman.

Chuck Roubik
Hamilton

Support for Hoffman

Dear Editor,

I would like to convey an experience I’ve had, specifically to the Celebrating Conservatism folks; many of whom I have a lot of respect for and a great appreciation for the work that they are doing. I met Sheriff Chris Hoffman in a head butt. Not the most ideal manner in which to meet your local Sheriff… butting heads. I had an opinion about the Sheriff’s Department, based on one personal experience I'd had, and I made a careless remark about it, publicly. He called me on it…literally…he called me to discuss it. He wasn't too happy with me, and quite frankly, I felt the same about his department. We talked openly; a little stiff at first, but much to my pleasant surprise, he listened. We talked some more. I listened; knees secretly shaking, knowing I was on the losing side of the head butt, if he decided to dig in. We found some common ground. He's a public servant; I'm a willing servant. I don't like seeing hungry horses in our community and not being able to do anything about it; neither did he. I asked for answers to my questions. He patiently explained the parameters in which he had to work dictated to him by our laws; the strengths and limitations of being law enforcement and the extreme importance of respecting our citizens 4th Amendment right provided by the Constitution. I can certainly appreciate that and I know you can too. After we had both shared our different perspectives, with neither of us overly concerned about being politically correct with our language, he respectfully asked me to “please not work against him, but instead, work with him on the problem of hungry horses in our community.” I'll never forget the sincerity I heard in his voice. No hostility. No overblown ego or foolish pride. Instead, humility; willingness for discussion; open to constructive criticism if it leads to improved service to our community; sincere desire for solution. Wow. I was expecting a fight, but instead we were productively identifying the problem, and devising simple, workable, legal solutions to the satisfaction of both parties.

Are these not some of the best characteristics we could ask for in a community leader? He could have given me a stern reprimand or the golden blow off and dismissed me without further acknowledgement. Many in his position might have. After all, it's not a high priority issue and he's an extremely busy man, managing an extremely complex job. But instead he chose to demonstrate the skills that turned an adversary into an ally. And that, in my humble opinion, is an example of leadership at its finest. With so few true leaders to be found, who are not only capable and experienced, but willing to stand up under the pressure of the political environment that we find ourselves in, why would we even consider giving him up as our Sheriff?

My sincere hope is that you’ll find the common ground with our existing sheriff and work together to bring a better balance to our community. He’s one incumbent we need to keep. Chris Hoffman has earned his position and he's certainly earned my respect, and my vote.

Theresa Manzella
Hamilton

Guilty by inference

Dear Editor,

We have just seen a blizzard of innuendos, false attributions, and sleazy, ugly, negative campaign literature in the mail and newspapers. Is it really necessary to resort to these low levels to win an election? Sleazy campaign tactics are what has turned off many voters; voters who are not going to cast a ballot.

Recent example: Marilyn Jones' letters to the editor (10/12/10 Ravalli Republic), (10/13/10 Missoulian), rambles on about slave labor, exportation of jobs and illegal aliens. Ignorance is displayed as these are national issues, not state issues!

Marilyn Jones states she intends to cast her vote for Ron Ehli for HD 88. Does Marilyn Jones intend to commit election fraud? She is registered in HD 87 and cannot legally vote for Ehli! These allegations lead one to infer those ugly policies are attributable to Ehli's opponent, a well known highly esteemed woman who is noted for her integrity, sense of justice and loyalty to Montana industry and jobs. Personally, I am offended by these inferences made by Ehli's supporters.

Does Ehli, in a desperate effort to win the election, need to have his supporters stoop so low in an attempt to discredit her character and credibility with sleazy innuendos?

Jim Henderson
Hamilton

Support for Foss, Republicans

Dear Editor,

For me, it has gotten to the place where this period in an election cycle gets to be very upsetting. Some individuals involved in a campaign don't seem to hesitate calling their opponent names or making false statements.

It has been published in the various newspapers' letter sections that Suzy Foss is unintelligent, doesn't know what she is talking about, doesn't understand the "situation" in the Bitter Root, is encouraging huge development, and something "nuts" about U.N. helicopters flying over our valley.

I don't know what these false accusations are based on. Suzy is extremely intelligent, quick on her feet and very articulate. She has studied and understands the issues affecting the citizens of Ravalli County. I have known Suzy for many years and have always been impressed by her strong Christian ethic. She is a fiscal conservative with strong family values and has stood up to special interest groups for over 12 years. She feels that we need economic vitality in the valley, bringing businesses here which would provide good paying jobs, and she will work to bring down the size of county government using good common sense and a tight purse string. Important to her regarding our future is our families, jobs, and community. Returning to the frontier values that made Montana great - values including independence, a hard work ethic, a commitment to helping our neighbor, and being self reliant people not needing government to "fix" our problems are all important goals for her. She believes in open and transparent government where everyone is welcome to speak freely and without fear of being labeled "uncivil" when one feels his rights are being threatened. Suzy Foss will make an excellent County Commissioner!

The Republican Party has outstanding candidates running in this year's election. Each of them is available to answer any legitimate question from interested individuals. That's a great thing about living here in this beautiful Montana valley - our candidates and legislators are approachable and welcome discussions with anyone.

If you have not as yet voted, I encourage you to support the candidates who are in favor of less government control, more individual responsibility, who would use common sense to solve problems, and support lower taxes. Vote Republican, marking your ballots by the names of Denny Rehberg, Bob Lake, Pat Connell, Ron Ehli, Gary MacLaren, Ed Greef, Ron Stoltz. Matt Kanenwisher, Suzy Foss, Regina Plettenberg, Chris Hoffman, and Bill Fulbright.

Incidentally, this is the first time that I'm aware of that we have some information about the race for Supreme Court elections, which are non-partisan offices. Nels Swandal is the conservative candidate for Supreme Court Justice #4 and is well deserving of your vote.

Laurie Burnham
Hamilton

Fresh ideas in Helena

Dear Editor,

Having served on the Corvallis School board, I remain very concerned about the quality of education in our county and our state. Basic education gives our children the start they need and the mandatory skills they must have to succeed. Bob Lake has been in Helena a while and has served on the Education Committee. From my perspective he has done little if anything to improve education in Montana. We need someone with fresh ideas to sit in the Senate. Pam Erickson is a very smart person, even keeled, and very community minded. She has had businesses, and thus will be an advocate for not only the schoolchildren but small business... What I like best about Pam is she cares about people, irrespective of your political beliefs and listens well to your concerns. Let’s send Helena a fresh face who represents people, not just another good old boy. Please vote for Pam Erickson for Senate.

Joan Perry
Hamilton

If you knew Suzy ...

Dear Editor,

I am so very tired of the bickering and fighting that goes on in our county. I would hate for this fighting to escalate by electing an extremist to the Board of County Commissioners. Suzy Foss, whom I have known since the nineties, is a perfect example of such an extremist. She would raise havoc and set us back many years by forcing her agenda on all of us. Carlotta Grandstaff has a good mind, is moderate in her thinking, and has a sense of the bigger picture. Although I often disagree with Carlotta's opinions, I respect and also trust her to be fair and thoughtful in her decision making. Please vote for Carlotta for County Commissioner.

Joan Perry
Hamilton

Once a liberal, always a liberal

Dear Editor,

An amazing thing has happened. Some establishment RINOs have come out of the woodwork and are touting Carlotta Grandstaff as the “Wonder Woman” for the next term on the commission. But just because she has cleverly switched from Democrat to Independent doesn’t mean there has been a change in her political philosophy. She was a liberal/progressive Democrat, and now she is a liberal/progressive Independent!

I’ve been reading for years about her work on the Board of Commissioners. I’m not impressed. When I think of her previous efforts, the terms anachronism and oxymoron come to mind. Just because she has made a lurch to the right doesn’t signal a seismic change in her political philosophy. There have been years of her voting record that resulted in serious problems in the Bitter Root Valley – lost jobs, land issues – it’s pretty much her nanny state trying to run our lives like the D.C. Beltway has attempted since 2008. We don’t want it!

Finally, the “Republicans for Carlotta” did a real hatchet job on Suzy Foss, coincidentally patterned after the National Democratic Party’s dirty work to demonize conservative Republicans as candidates. Really tacky, I’d say. Quoting a statement to these people: “Nowadays common sense is an endangered species.” – Native Alaskan tribal leader

Bruce King
Hamilton

Tax money wasted

Dear Editor,

Because of Ravalli County’s Commissioners refusal to honor private property owners’ right to develop their land, you the taxpayers are paying the cost of eighteen lawsuits filed against the county by these same property owners to defend their property rights.

Here is an e-mail to the commissioners from the head of the Ravalli County Road and Bridge Department to update the costs of one of the settlements.

From: David Ohnstad

Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:23 AM

To: Greg Chilcott; Carlotta Grandstaff; James Rokosch; J.R. Iman; Kathleen Driscoll

Subject: upper woodchuck road

Good Morning -

Pursuant to request … the project totals for Upper Woodchuck Road, to date, include $45,575.08 for RCRBD personnel (at “billing” rates), $74,898.77 for RCRBD equipment (at internal “rental” rates), $31,629.50 for equipment rentals (private vendors), $16,938.56 for design engineering and contract administration, and $3442.76 for construction materials and supplies for a total of $172,484.67.  We expect additional (modest) invoices for equipment rental (shouldering machine) and construction inspection and testing, and have not yet entered into project accounting the value of the aggregate materials we obtained at the county’s Stevensville Gravel Mine or construction materials obtained from the RCRBD warehouse.

The value of the contract for the ACP (asphalt paving) was $142,800.00.

David

This is the total amount for the above project costs to date, and it’s not even finished yet.

And it’s not the only suit of this kind. There have been at least 17 more suits like this in the recent past.

Because of questionable legal advice given to our commissioners (and taken by them) by the current county attorney, you, the taxpayer, are paying for the cost of numerous lawsuits, not just attorney’s fees but also settlement costs, and staff hours devoted to their defense.

Usually, costs for settlements such as the one above come out of an insurance policy purchased by county governments for exactly such a purpose. However, this was not the case for the project defined above. And there are other consequences. Even when the settlement costs for other suits are paid by the insurance policy, there are still insurance deductible costs of $81,400.00.

Because of all of the suits against the county, the insurance premiums have gone up 100%. MACo (Montana Association of Counties) “self insures all 56 counties in Montana with taxpayer money (your money). After exceeding the $2million policy of self insurance, the 56 counties re insure with a larger insurance company for monster claims. It doesn’t take many suits to go over $2M and then we pay more in insurance premiums.

An example of settlement costs is the $315,284.59 (so far) paid out of the County Road and Bridge budget to pave 1.4 miles of Upper Woodchuck Road in Florence.

In addition, $20,000 cash was paid to the party that sued the county. This road goes to Missoula County (The road to nowhere). The $315,284.59 was spent out of the road and bridge department that could have been spent on repairing other county roads or bridges. This is public record.

This is only one settlement in which your tax dollars are being spent to please the current county attorney and three incumbent commissioners up for re election November 2.

I don’t know what the priorities in the budget are, but I do know that the money they are spending to defend themselves could be used for additional funding for other road repairs.

This amounts to a large sum of money. It is shameful that the citizens of Ravalli County have to resort to suing their county in order to protect their property rights. In the case of paving Upper Wood Chuck Road, the owner had planned to pave the road as part of the proposed project(not the county). What a waste of our money!

The best of intentions, pave the way to hell. Central planning is almost always well intended.

I support the following candidates: Bill Fulbright for County Attorney, Suzie Foss for County Commissioner, Matt Kanenwisher for County Commissioner, Ron Stoltz for County Commissioner.

These folks have shown themselves to be hard working, honest and trustworthy. Call them up with your comments and questions. Find out for yourselves about their experience and values. You will be pleased with their answers. Go to the Republican website HYPERLINK "http://www.ravcogop.com"www.ravcogop.com for their contact information. Come by the Roxy Theatre in Hamilton to find out more.

Susanna Pyron
Florence

©2009 Bitterroot Star
This site was Done By Dooney