14-member legislative bloc pledges to push state Legislature further to right
by Arren Kimbel-Sannit, Montana Free Press
The mission of a freedom caucus, Montana congressman Matt Rosendale told state lawmakers in Helena Thursday evening, can be defined by what it fights against.
“The radical left is trying to destroy our families, they’re trying to keep us from practicing our faith, and they’re trying to brainwash our children,” Rosendale said. “And it is really those three things that can encapsulate what we are all fighting.”
Rosendale emerged as one of the most prominent — and obstinate — members of the U.S. House Freedom Caucus, a coalition of hardline Republican lawmakers, during the protracted fight for the House speakership that gripped Congress earlier this month. Now, with assistance from Rosendale and a national organization called the State Freedom Caucus Network, the Montana Legislature is getting its own such group.
The Montana Freedom Caucus, chaired by Sen. Theresa Manzella, R-Hamilton, is a bloc of 14 named members — with more, she has said, who do not want to identify themselves — in both the state House and Senate who say they will present a unified, conservative front in Helena. The group announced its formation at the beginning of the session, and formally launched at an event in the state capital Thursday night with Rosendale at the top of the bill.
“What you saw play out in Washington is what the power of a small group can do,” Rosendale said to a large crowd in the Capitol’s old Supreme Court chambers. “This freedom caucus is going to be … the tip of the spear.”
The caucus does not include any top legislative leaders, but does feature a smattering of whips, committee chairs and vice chairs, including Manzella, who chairs the Senate Highways and Transportation Committee.
In addition to Manzella and the named caucus members, a handful of other Republican lawmakers floated around the chamber, though whether they were there out of allegiance to the caucus’ mission or mere curiosity wasn’t clear. Sen. Wendy McKamey, R-Great Falls, gen
erally regarded as a comparatively moderate member of the Republican caucus, briefly appeared, generating some chittering from the crowd. She had an invitation, she noted.
Unlike in Washington, D.C., where Republicans have a 10-seat majority in the House and a minority in the Senate, the GOP has a vise grip on state government in Helena, with a bicameral legislative supermajority and Republicans holding every statewide office from the governorship on down. In the 2021 session, the Legislature, led by the state’s first Republican governor in 16 years, passed restrictions on abortion, tax cuts, an expansion of permitless carry and a litany of other conservative priorities. By all accounts, the 2023 session, with its even larger Republican majority, will look similar.
But Helena, Manzella said, has not moved far enough to the right.
“Do you ever wonder why we send conservative majorities to Helena but we still seem to creep to the left?” she asked the audience. “We do too. That’s what we’re all about.”
For the new state Freedom Caucus to adopt an issue as a priority, 80% of its members must agree, Manzella said. On Thursday, the caucus announced five legislative priorities: judicial reform; spending down the state’s roughly $2 billion budget surplus in the form of tax rebates; parental rights, including school choice and “curriculum transparency”; election integrity; and preventing foreign nations from purchasing or controlling Montana land.
Already, those priorities are beginning to manifest in legislation. Rep. Jerry Schillinger, R-Circle, said the caucus has a bill in the works for a $1.25 billion tax rebate, a greater sum than in any other tax plan so far put forth by lawmakers or the governor’s office.
Rosendale and caucus members also spoke of medical freedom, apparently using the phrase to reference vaccine skepticism rather than abortion access, a target of ire among the GOP’s right flank.
Sen. Barry Usher, R-Billings, the caucus’ treasurer, said he doesn’t believe “medical freedom” means access to abortion or medical care for transgender people, but noted that the caucus doesn’t have an official position.
“I believe that we have not discussed that and we have not taken votes on that, so as a caucus, I can’t say that we’re for or against that,” he told Montana Free Press in reference to abortion. “And I think you all know my position.”
The Montana Freedom Caucus got off the ground with a call last year from Rosendale to Manzella.
“I said, look, Montana needs a Freedom Caucus. We have these supermajorities in both chambers of the Republicans, but they need to have a smaller group that can be the unified voice, the organized, unified voice for the conservative movement,” Rosendale told reporters after the event.
Manzella assembled a list of potential members, and the national organization audited their voting records and personal backgrounds.
“They checked our voting records and they checked our backgrounds, because they do not want to be embarrassed by any skeletons in our closet, or people who might claim to be conservative but really aren’t,” Manzella said.
“Have you ever dealt with anyone like that?” she asked the audience, to laughter.
In December, the group went to Washington, D.C. to meet with Rosendale and the State Freedom Caucus Network for training. The network is an organization affiliated with the Congressional Freedom Caucus launched in late 2021. It’s led by Republican operative and former Club for Growth Executive Director Andy Roth and former House Freedom Caucus Executive Director Justin Ouimette. The chapter in Montana is one of a dozen state legislative caucuses across the country.
Rosendale said the national caucus can provide resources — speakers, expertise, general information — to the local affiliates. He said he hadn’t “given a thought” to whether that would include financial support.
The group is also paying for a state director, Lewis and Clark County Republican Central Committee Chair Darin Gaub.
Usher said the possibility of a financial arrangement remains open. He solicited monetary pledges from the audience, and noted that the caucus could form a political action committee.
“If we become a PAC, you know, we’re going to need money, right? So I’ve already got two people that have said, ‘Yeah, we’re going to give money.”
As the Republican caucus in the Montana Legislature has grown, so too have its apparent divisions between hardline conservative ideologues and pragmatists willing to collaborate on bipartisan agendas. The formal creation of a voting bloc in the mold of a national caucus that’s made a name by sticking fingers in the eyes of Republican leadership could inflame that dynamic.
Rosendale said Thursday that party unity is secondary to the mission at hand.
“You can’t put the same people in office and use the same rules and think that you’re going to have a different outcome,” he said. “If you want change, you have to make change. When you’re taking power from someone, they will not relinquish it. You have to take it from them.”
In an interview Tuesday, House Speaker Matt Regier, R-Kalispell, said he was not concerned about the creation of a new faction within the larger Republican caucus.
“My take here as leadership is I’ve got a caucus of 68 and that’s the Republican caucus,” Regier said. “There’s a sportsmen’s caucus, there’s the freedom caucus, there’s all sorts of different caucuses that have their own agendas and what they want to do for top priorities. But at the end of the day, we’ve got 68 Republicans out of 100 in the House here, and it’s going to take us 51 to pass a bill across the floor.”
In a statement this week, minority-party Democrats described members of the Montana Freedom Caucus as “extremists” intent on destroying Montana’s public institutions and eroding freedoms. They contrasted the small-government attitudes of the group with the fact that many of its members’ businesses benefited from federal subsidies and forgivable loans during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Diane says
Now we have our own Marjorie Taylor Greene and her Extremists Right Wingers. Sounds like a heavy metal band. Too bad that is not the case. Wouldn’t it be great if liars’ pants actually did catch on fire?
Kathren Greco says
God Bless the Montana Freedom Caucus.
Thank you for defending :
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Edward says
I completely agree Helen! Tim is just one of her drones, pay no attention. We need to disband these extremists.
Alan says
Make no mistake Helen you are never going to get your idiotic convention of states. Ever. Yes, abortion is murder, and the baby has no choice in the matter so stop calling it freedom of choice, it’s just pro-murder.
helen sabin says
Its most interesting that the photo-op group that Manzella “heads,” has as their purpose – MEDICAL FREEDOM (cough cough), SELF ACTUALIZATION, (cough cough), and PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY (with this idea, I totally agree). However, this “medical freedom”group seems to be misnamed as she and the members want to totally ban abortions with no exceptions in Montana. That is not freedom from government which most Montanans prefer. This seems to be “freedom” as DEFINED by government.
According to Manzella, she and her “members,” are CONSERVATIVES but are NOT far enough right. How then does she define conservative? and how far right? Extreme would be a better term for this group. Do Montanans really want a caucus that is far right telling us what to do? Defining MEDICAL freedom? They should call their organization, LIMITED MEDICAL FREEDOM and tyrannical.
Further Manzella is not trustworthy. She misled the state legislature in 2021, telling them that an Article V Convention would lead to us losing our 2nd Amendment rights. She had to have known that wasn’t true as she was one of three representative for Montana at the simulation for an Article V convention, and yet she persisted in stating that misinformation. Shame on her for instilling fear in the state legislature and shame on the Republican and Democratic legislature members who voted with her for NOT knowing what is done at an Article V convention – how it works and its purpose.
What’s more telling is that every single Democrat voted with her on killing the vote for a constitutional activity that the founding fathers gave us and wanted us to use to stop an abusive federal government. It seems that Manzella is not really a “Constitutional conservative” but one who picks and chooses what part of the Constitution she supports. She seems mixed up being a part-time conservative, but a full time anti-constitutional member of the John Birch group of whom she said she was a proud member on talk radio last week.
And the conservative movement? What or who is that? Right-wing extremism? wanting to control women’s bodies and what they do with them? Does that represent most of Montana and its citizens? they don’t think so given the marches and protests that echoed throughout Montana when the Supreme Court reversed Roe versus Wade. It also doesn’t comport with the Montana Constitution that does have a “right to privacy.” Again though, what does that mean?
Further I question where does she have the time to start these kinds of groups being a legislator? Maybe she should spend more time studying the bills that are presented in Helena and the Constitution more since she has all kinds of available free time.
She should learn the Constitution and uphold its intent – freedom from government rule and power hungry legislators who need photo ops to appear “useful” to the people.
Tim says
Helen:
If you would take a minute to get off your broom and look at Manzella’s voting record…you will find it 100% Constitutional, both the US and MT. I believe I would put Manzella’s record up against any other Senator in the State. Some may compare, but none exceed her stance on conservative values and the US Constitution. Must you always bring the COS up, one would think you are their payroll too.