By Brian Schweitzer, Former Governor of Montana, Georgetown Lake, Anaconda
Recently, AFP (Americans For Prosperity) conducted a sham public meeting in Dillon to condemn extending healthcare coverage to people in Montana who make less than $16,000. AFP is bankrolled by the Koch Brothers. The money spent to provide this healthcare would come 100% from the Federal government, not the Montana State treasury.
The Koch Brothers and some GOP allies here in Montana say that the Federal government spends too much money. I agree. But, they don’t want to start saving in the massive military budget, not the perks to Washington politicians, not to highway contractors or foreign governments or even subsidies to agriculture millionaires. The Koch brothers didn’t question healthcare provided to seniors, veterans or to Medicaid in other states representing two-thirds of the U.S. population.
Nope, the Koch brothers have decided that the # 1 place to start saving money is right here in Montana with the health of our poorest people.
The two Koch Brothers are worth $88 billion — even more than Bill Gates or Warren Buffet according to Forbes Magazine. I have nothing against great wealth and I still hope to get there. The Koch Brothers inherited a great fortune and grew it through the years with hard work, old-fashion smarts and government subsidies — in part, ironically, near Dillon, Montana.
They have owned the 200,000-acre + Matador Ranch near Dillon for more than 50 years. Well, not really owned the ranch, because about one-third of the ranch is owned by the state of Montana while the Federal government owns around another third. The brothers rent the land from the State and the Feds to graze their 2,000 head of cattle.
I am a rancher so I crunched the numbers. The current rate charged for a cow unit on private land in Montana is about $25 per month. The Koch Brothers have historically paid $6.50 per month on State of Montana land and $1.50 on Federal land. So let’s add up the subsidy:
Assume one-third of the cattle stay on Koch land and two-thirds on government land. Cattle only graze nine months of the year, and eat hay the other three months. That’s a pretty normal Montana cattle operation. Let’s look at it closer:
First, the Montana subsidy. 666 cattle times nine months, with a subsidy of $18.50 per month (a $25 private lease minus the State rate of $6.50), for a whopping Montana subsidy of $110,889 per year, times the 50 years of ownership, for a grand total of $5,544,450.
Now, for the Federal subsidy. 666 cattle times nine months, with a subsidy of $23.50 per month (a $25 private lease minus the Federal rate of $1.50), for a Federal subsidy of $140,859 per year, times 50 years — a very generous $7,042,950.
Yup, the Koch Brothers got some 12.5 million bucks in government subsidies to pay 11 AFP staffers to intimidate and hoodwink the Montana Legislature into rejecting hundreds of millions of Federal dollars annually for healthcare of 70,000 Montana citizens, which would create thousands of Montana jobs, many at rural hospitals in areas represented by Responsible Republican legislators.
The Affordable Care Act did some good things like covering people with pre-existing conditions and mental illness, not allowing women to be charged more than men for healthcare and covering all Americans so that those of us who pay for insurance aren’t stuck paying higher fees because of cost shift from those who do not. The law was a give-away to big insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies who continue to charge three to ten times in the U.S.A. as they do in the rest of the world. Responsible Republicans have made the point, this law is not perfect and Congress should fix the law’s problems and save the good features.
Meanwhile Responsible Republicans in the tradition of Lincoln, Ted Roosevelt, Reagan and Bohlinger should stand up to the far right, stand with Montana and use the Federal Medicaid health dollars in Montana in the same way they support Federal dollars for Medicare, highway contractors, farmers, ranchers (including Koch Brothers), veterans, the National Guard, Malmstrom, and our Universities. We pay Federal income tax like folks in the other 50 states. Why allow our share to go to healthcare in other states?
Jim Ellingson says
I found Brian Schweitzer’s guest column comments, in the February 25th issue of the Bitterroot Star, to be extremely deceptive and intentionally misleading. Schweitzer’s column, in part, dealt with the issue of cattle grazing allotments on public lands, both state and federal. He compared the average cost of renting private land with the amount charged by the state and federal governments for grazing. At first glance the difference is quite substantial. However, what Mr. Schweitzer has conveniently omitted from his column are the many reasons for the difference in the grazing costs.
When this country was settled, the farmers homesteaded all of the best farm ground; everything that they felt they could make a living on was turned into farms and ranches. Those farmers did not lay claim to what is now our publicly-held lands because, even though those lands were essentially free for the taking, they concluded that said lands were not productive enough for them to make a living on. That hasn’t changed.
Add to that poorer productivity the lack of infrastructure on public lands (such as fencing, waterers, etc.), an often more restrictive list of requirements and the greater risk of problems from large predators, and you will find many ranchers questioning whether grazing on public lands is even cost effective at all. Indeed, there are many ranchers with grazing allotments on public lands that opt not to use them because it simply does not pencil out.
So, ex-governor Schweitzer’s claim that those allotments are a form of government subsidy and that the holders of those allotments are getting rich off of those allotments is totally dishonest. It is a major distortion of the truth coming from someone who knows better.