by Tim Adams, Stevensville
Thank you to Michael Howell for his return to actual journalism—diligently calling local government agencies rather than merely printing talking points from Democrats, as the Bitterroot Star did when Jon Tester promoted the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022. It’s refreshing to see curiosity about government resurface—though only when Republicans are in charge.
I’m baffled by the sudden wave of Elon Musk hate. When he was launching rockets and producing the most popular electric car—with billions in government subsidies—Democrats applauded. Joe Biden even signed an executive order in 2021 pushing for 50% of all car sales to be electric, later raising it to 67% by 2032. Gavin Newsom, whose wealthy in-laws own local property, ordered California to ban gas-powered vehicles by 2035.
Yet now, the same party that mandated EVs suddenly encourages vandalizing them. If climate change is truly an existential crisis, why is attacking Musk a higher priority than transitioning to clean energy? Surely, one man’s political leanings can’t justify abandoning environmental principles.
Progressives also betray their values on public-sector unions. FDR opposed them, warning in 1937:
“All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining cannot be transplanted into the public service. A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent to obstruct the operations of government. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable.”
Yet today, government workers earn 18-22% more in wages than private-sector counterparts, with benefits that far surpass those in the private economy. In March ’23 the BLS reported public sector workers make on average $17 more an hour than their private sector counterparts. In Montana, many retire with full pensions after just 20 years, often re-entering government for a second pension—all guaranteed for life, funded by taxpayers.
The real reason Democrats resist transparency? Our tax dollars are funneled into their political machines. Every new bureaucrat means more union dues feeding campaigns. Grants for the “public good” often serve as voter mobilization funds. It’s a gross abuse of government power, betraying the progressive ideal that government should serve the people, not a single party.
Mike Miller says
wma, the thing about pointing a finger and calling names, is you point three fingers back at yourself, as your comment above clearly shows.
I googled “biden mandate electric cars”, and “democrat governors mandate electric cars”. A plethora of articles came up, both at federal level (biden) and states (democrats): biden DID mandate electric vehicles, as well as dem govs from california, New Mexico, Maryland, and New York. Probably more; there are lots of articles from multiple sources.
When a president/governor sets a mandate of a % of anything, that’s exactly what a “mandate” is. You clearly need to research what a government mandate is… unless you wish to continue the very “dishonest dumbassery” you complain of.
WMA says
There’s a wealth of dishonest dumbassery in this screed, but I will address just one for now. Neither Biden nor the Democrats mandated anything about electric vehicles. Biden did set a goal to encourage American auto companies to make 50 percent of their output EVs by 2030. That means the other half will be gas powered. Buy an EV or don’t. The decision is up to the consumer. That is not a mandate.
Timothy Adams says
Even the LA Times called it a mandate.
C’mon man…
https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-12-11/why-newsoms-electric-vehicle-mandate-is-in-trouble
Bill Cavanaugh says
The Free Market should determine the number of gas vehicles made, NOT THE GOVERNMENT. Speaking of Dumbassery.